My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/14/2000 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2000
>
08/14/2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2014 11:20:54 AM
Creation date
2/12/2014 12:48:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/14/2000
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Duke - <br />Need your help again! <br />The Lino Lakes City Council has asked for a Charter Commission opinion <br />regarding Section 8 of the City Charter. During a public hearing on <br />assessment rolls there was confusion about the period of time during which <br />property owners can petition out of the process. <br />Speakers at the public hearing questioned whether the sixty day period <br />for petitioning out of the project could have begun last November or even <br />this June, before council had received all the information needed to make a <br />decision, i.e. the estimated costs and the appraisals of affected <br />properties. <br />The following is my opinion, please respond back as to your belief of <br />its accuracy. <br />Section 8.04 provides a step by step process which needs to followed. <br />The first step is that the Council adopts a resolution to provide means to <br />obtain a cost estimate. Once the estimate is received, the Council sets the <br />public hearing date. After the public hearing has concluded, a period of <br />sixty days shall elapse before any action can be taken. If during the sixty <br />day period a majority petition is received against the improvement (as is <br />the case in this proposed situation), the council shall not be able to make <br />the improvement at the expense of the property owner. <br />The question here is whether the petitioning could have started early <br />(prior to cost estimates and the public hearing). I believe the answer is <br />no. I think that as the Charter is a legal document, actions must be <br />followed step by step. In this case, a petition received last November or <br />this June is before the public hearing. I believe that once the Public <br />Hearing date is set, it "starts the clock" on the process. The process <br />allows for submission of a petition during the sixty period, not before. <br />Additionally, I would be surprised if a citizen would submit a petition <br />either for or against the improvement without knowing the cost estimate. <br />I would appreciate you opinion back! <br />As always, thanks for your assistance. <br />John Sullivan <br />Charter Commission Chair <br />(651) 784 -3511 <br />John, <br />I agree with you. The 60 day period during which a petition may be received <br />starts after the public hearing. Does your city attorney agree? The city <br />attorney would be the one to advise the council on this matter. <br />Duke <br />•d <br />7n77_O7o,rco� <br />LIfl 1 TUW D7no em1.:Rn nn 7n °gnu <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.