My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/09/2002 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2002
>
01/09/2002 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2014 10:41:35 AM
Creation date
2/13/2014 10:33:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
01/09/2002
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />January 9, 2002 <br />Page 20 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />Mr. Asleson noted the staff report indicated the requested rezoning would allow 1.8 units <br />per acre. However, because there is only approximately four acres of upland area, he <br />questioned why seven units were being proposed. <br />Mr. Asleson stated many years ago he worked on a bridge crew to pay his way through <br />college and a close friend currently runs a family business in North Dakota building <br />bridges. He could not recall ever building a bridge with only 31 feet of pilings. He <br />questioned who will be responsible for inspecting and approving the construction of the <br />private road and bridge and who will design the bridge. He also questioned who would <br />be responsible for the bridge if the private ownership does not pan out. <br />Mr. Asleson noted the applicant has not provided any written approval from the Rice <br />Creek Watershed District. <br />Mr. Asleson stated he had received a bridge permit two summers ago for land he owns in <br />northern Minnesota. He stated his bridge was basically a box car with the top removed. <br />He indicated the requirements of the Department of Natural Resources at that time had <br />been very loose and only required that the bridge not impact the water. <br />Mr. Asleson noted in its report to the City, the Department of Natural Resources had <br />indicated that Ward Lake is a Natural Environment basin and has a structure setback <br />requirement of 150 feet, and a Shore Impact Zone of 75 feet. Additionally, the report <br />cited the loss of virtually all vegetation on the island during grading and that the location <br />of the proposed road is entirely in the Shore Impact Zone and cannot meet the required <br />setback. <br />Mr. Asleson indicated the high water marks had been determined in 1991 and he <br />questioned the accuracy of those marks and whether this needed updating. He believed <br />in the last 10 years the water level has changed. <br />Mr. Asleson stated the Department of Natural Resources’ website states that the <br />Shoreland Management Act regulates all land within 1,000 feet of a lake and 300 feet of <br />a river in a designated flood plane. Additionally, the Shoreland Management Act <br />requires local units of government with priority shoreland to adopt these or stricter <br />standards into their zoning ordinances. <br />Mr. Asleson indicated the Department of Natural Resources has classified Wards Lake as <br />a natural environment lake. He noted the guidelines for a natural environment lake, <br />which require a lot area of 40,000 square feet, lot width of 125 feet and structure setback <br />of 150 feet. He indicated that per the prelim inary plat four of the seven lots would be <br />less than 125 feet wide and all seven lots appear to be less than 40,000 square feet in <br />area. <br />Mr. Asleson indicated his father was a devel oper for many years and he did not want Mr. <br />Vaughn to be prevented from utilizing his land as he sees fit. However, at this point he
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.