My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/10/2002 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2002
>
04/10/2002 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2014 10:35:39 AM
Creation date
2/13/2014 10:35:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
04/10/2002
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />April 10, 2002 <br />Page 16 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />Mr. Hyden asked if they were removing any wetlands. Mr. Weiland replied they would <br />be impacting some of the wetlands, but they were not completely removing any. He <br />stated they were impacting 2 acres and it wa s being replaced 2 to 1 on site. They were <br />replacing more than they were required to repl ace. He stated they were meeting the Rice <br />Creek Watershed rules regarding this. <br />Mr. Hyden asked what was the penalty if futu re residents impacted the wetlands. Mr. <br />Weiland stated this would be up to the City and their rules. <br />Mr. Hyden asked who was overseeing that the future residents would not impact the <br />wetlands. Mr. Weiland stated as the devel oper they were required to monitor the <br />wetlands they created, but beyond that, it wa s under City’s control and monitoring. He <br />stated the monitoring they were talking abou t was the wetlands they created to make sure <br />they got established. <br />Mr. Corson asked if they could extend their util ities across the St. Paul Waterline. Brian <br />Krystofiak stated they could cross over it, but they had strict guide lines that would need <br />to be followed and they would work closely with them on this. <br />Mr. Grochala replied with respect to tabl ing it would need to wait on the Met Council’s <br />comments on the Comprehensive Plan, but this project did meet the Plan as it stood today <br />and they would continue to work with the de veloper and residents to attempt to work out <br />any remaining issues. <br />Mr. Corson requested another not ice be sent to the reside nts once this item was brought <br />back. <br />Chair Schaps asked if further public comments could be made even though the public <br />hearing had been closed. Mr. Smyser rep lied they could reopen the public hearing upon <br />notice. <br />Ms. Lane made a MOTION to table Stone ybrook’s MUSA Allocation, Rezoning, and <br />Preliminary Plat requests to obtain additiona l information and modifications as noted in <br />staff’s report until staff directs the item s hould be placed on the Planning and Zoning <br />Board’s agenda. <br />The motion was supported by Mr. Corson. <br />Motion carried 5-0. <br />Mr. Zych left the meeting at 8:55 p.m. <br />VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br />Ms. Lane asked how the Ordinance Task Fo rce was coming along. Chair Schaps replied <br />they were having meetings and they were al most on track. He stated the meetings were <br />going well and he believed they would be caught up in two weeks.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.