Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />April 10, 2002 <br />Page 2 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />Chair Schaps opened the Public Hearing at 6:40 p.m. <br />Staff presented the application by Bald Ea gle Contractors CUP for Outdoor Storage. <br />Staff reviewed the background of the lot by explaining applicant had submitted an <br />application for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for outdoor storage. He stated applicants <br />wished to move his construction business to th e site and store vehicl es outdoors, such as <br />trucks and a construction traile r. He explained the current application did not include a <br />site plan review. Typically, a CUP applica tion such as this would be accompanied by <br />complete site plan information. He noted it was staff’s understandi ng that the applicant <br />wanted to find out if the outdoor storage wa s possible before committing to designing the <br />building, grading, utilities, and other elements. <br />Staff presented its analysis by explaining th e site consisted of two parcels totaling <br />approximately 1.3 acres. He explained th e City Council adopted Ordinance 02-2000 in <br />February, 2000. This amendment to the Zoni ng Ordinance established open and outdoor <br />storage as a conditional use in the Light Industrial Zoning Di strict. It also listed very <br />specific limitations regarding where such storage was allowed. <br />• Several requirements pertained to the de sign of the site. Staff did not have <br />specific design information necessary to judge if the application complied with <br />all the Ordinance requirements, such as those for lighting and parking. <br />• Staff can address the location requirement s now. The Ordinance stated that the <br />property could not abut prope rty zoned residential, rura l, or business. Abutting <br />included across the street. The subject site was directly across the street from an <br />R-3 zoning district. <br />Staff explained the intent of the Ordina nce was to allow outdoor storage only on light <br />industrial sites that were internal to the zoning district. He stated th e sites were not to be <br />on the edges of an L-1 zoning district, but toward the inside of the district. That way, the <br />storage sites would always be screened, no t only by onsite design features, but also by <br />other industrial properties. <br />He indicated the proposed site was exactly the type of lo cation prohibited by the outdoor <br />storage Ordinance. <br />• The Ordinance stated that the actual out door storage area c ould not abut a school <br />or park. The property abuts a stor m water pond on school property, but the <br />submitted sketch showed a fenced area for storage, which did not abut the school <br />property. An area with “grass s eed” is shown se parating the two. <br />Staff noted the seeded area appeared to cove r only half the entire site, according to the <br />drawing, rendering it unusable. Staff indicated it was probable that once the business and <br />storage were established, a successful construction bus iness would grow and need <br />additional storage area for equipment. Contra ctor yards typically accumulate more and <br />more equipment and material over time. Staff stated that because of the type of business