Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />May 8, 2002 <br />Page 6 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />addressed in the previous agenda item (T horp). Should this approval occur, then <br />consideration of this request for a Variance is in order. <br />Staff stated the subject site was zoned Ru ral Executive (R-X) and measures 100’ X 423’ <br />(42,300 sq. ft.). The property was surrounded to the north, east and west by similarly <br />zoned property, and to the south by property zoned Rural. The property contained a <br />1200-foot detached garage. <br />Mr. William Neeck was the prospective buyer of the property and planned to construct a <br />1,125 square foot home with a 630 square foot attached garage. <br />Staff presented its analysis by explaining A ccessory square footage was limited to 1,120 <br />square feet for a parcel of this size and zoning classifica tion according to the Lino Lakes <br />Zoning Ordinance (Section 3, subd. 4.D.8.g). Since the pre-existing garage alone <br />measured 1200 square feet, under City Ordinance, a variance was needed. <br />Staff explained City Ordinance required an attached garage as a building requirement for <br />the Rural Executive Zone (Section 5, subdivi sion 2.C.3). As a result, Mr. Neeck was <br />asking for a Variance from the maximum allo wable accessory square footage cited under <br />City Ordinance, in order that he be allo wed to construct a 630-square foot attached <br />garage. <br />Staff noted square footage of the existing detached garage and the proposed attached <br />garage would bring total accessory square footage on the property to 1,830 sq. ft. This <br />was 710 sq. ft. over what was allowed under City Ordinance. The applicant had been <br />apprised, in light of so much resulting accessory building square footage, of City <br />Ordinance as it related to exterior stor age issues (Section 3, subd. 4.R.1.a.) and home <br />occupations (Section 3, subd. 8.D). <br />Staff reviewed the five findings for a variance. <br />Staff stated as a result of the above Findings of Fact, staff recommended approval of the <br />Variance, with the following condition: the lot size Variance and Minor Subdivision <br />discussed in agenda item 5B (Thorp) mu st obtain City Council approval before this <br />Variance was effective. <br />Chair Schaps asked if any residents had object ed to this request. Ms. Gretz replied staff <br />had received no comments from the neighbors. <br />William Neeck, 990 Main Street, stated the ga rage was built in 1975, and he had received <br />no objection from the neighbors to that size of garage because it wa s an already existing <br />structure. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked if there was anyway the existing structure could be changed so it <br />would match the new facility. Mr. Neeck replied that was his intent. He stated he <br />intended on painting the garage, as well as reroofing it so it would match the home. He <br />stated at some point in the future, he intended on making it maintenance free which was <br />what the home would be. He stated the pa inting and reroofing may not get done right