Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />August 14, 2002 <br />Page 13 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />building plan review process. At this point, the site plans provided for Lots 1-3 are <br />conceptual in nature and are intended to dem onstrate the developabili ty of the lots and a <br />comprehensive storm water management and circulation system. <br />Access to the proposed retail center is to be provided via two 30-foot wide curb cuts <br />along Apollo Drive. <br />While the westerly curb cut is in direct alignment with an existing curb cut to the north, <br />the easternmost curb cut is slightly offset fr om an existing curb cut to the north. As a <br />condition of site and building plan approval, the easterly cu rb cut should be shifted <br />approximately 15 feet to the west to create a direct alignment. Additionally, approval of <br />the easterly curb cut will require an access agreement with Kohl’s. <br />Staff stated the proposed circul ation is considered well con ceived and is integrated into <br />the overall circulation system proposed for the subdivision. <br />One minor concern that exists in regard to site circulation is the temporary dead-end <br />parking arrangement on the west side of the site. To address this concern, a temporary <br />turn-around should be provided at the western terminus of the parki ng area (either on site <br />or within Lot 3). <br />Staff indicated while the Planned Development Over lay designation can provide <br />flexibility from the strict terms of the Or dinance, the requirements of the underlying SC, <br />Shopping Center District are considered an appropriate guideline. <br />Staff noted within SC zoning di stricts, a 50-foot setback is required from arterial streets. <br />As shown on the preliminary site plan, a 30-foot principal build ing setback has been <br />proposed along I-35. At 2.3 acres in size, th e subject property also fails to meet the <br />minimum 3-acre lot requirement imposed in the SC District. <br />Staff stated the PDO section of the Ordinance does state how ever, that perimeter setbacks <br />can be established by applying the setback requirements of th e surrounding district or can <br />be related to the height of the buildings. While both the proposed setback and lot area <br />deviations can be accommodated via the PDO, City officials should determine their <br />acceptability. <br />As a condition of site and building plan a pproval, a determination should be made that <br />the proposed building is cons istent with the design gui delines of the Lino Lakes <br />Marketplace PDO. As shown on the submitte d building elevations, the proposed building <br />replicates many of the design features of the adjacent Target and Kohl’s buildings <br />including: <br />• Colonial Style gable roof forms <br />• Cornice details <br />• A defined base <br />• Accentuated building corners <br />• Finish colors