08/14/2002 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board August 14, 2002 Page 25 APPROVED MINUTES 5. The plat should illustrate the flight sa fety zones necessary to allow Lino Airpark to continue to operate in the future without negatively impacting the newly created single family lots. 6. Public Works should provide comments as to the acceptability of landscape islands within the pr oposed cul-de-sac areas. 7. The applicant should describe how the wetlands and outlots will be utilized or owned pertinent to the establishment of greenway corridors and whether they will become public open space or owne d privately through a homeowners’ association. 8. A concept plan be that illustrates the futu re subdivision of the exceptions (that are being surrounded by the Behms Century Farm preliminary plat) including potential street corridors a nd lot configurations that could be implemented without negatively impacting Sunset Drive (colle ctor street) or th e subdivision that is currently requested. The applicant should provide a description of architectural standards that would be imposed on the proposed hangar area as well as homeowners’ a ssociation rules that would guarantee continued main tenance of this facility. Chair Schaps invited applicant to make comments. John Johnson, the applicant’s engineer, Metro Land Surveying & Engineering, 412 County Road D, Little Canada. He requested feedback and direction from the Board regarding alterations. He gave a brief summary of the proposal. Ferrill Robinson, SRF Consultant Group, summ arized the proposal for the roads and collector streets. He reviewed the traffic report prepared on behalf of the applicant and the traffic impacts to the area from present to 2015. The report includes expected levels of service for several locations. For year 2015 conditions, it was assumed that the east- west minor collector roadway would be constructed north of Carl Street. Mr. Lyden asked what percent of traffic went north v. south on the collector street. Mr. Robinson summarized that information from the report. Mr. Lyden asked if they had assumed there would be a cloverleaf at I35W and Main. Mr. Robinson replied they had not assumed there was going to be a cloverleaf at I35W and Main. Mr. Smyser stated this traffic report was inc onsistent with what was discussed previously. He stated the developer does not want to connect to Carl Street, even though staff recommends there is a connection. He stat ed there were a number of concerns among residents regarding traffic if the road went through. He stated the design did allow the road to be built, which would not impact th e existing homes as far as setback issues. He stated the problem with putting this off into the future is that they would be creating a new neighborhood that had only outlets onto Sunset and this was something to be avoided. The other things is that if this ro ad did not get connected to Carl Street, staff had no idea when/if the connection would be made. He stated if they created a