My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/14/2002 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2002
>
08/14/2002 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2014 10:38:25 AM
Creation date
2/13/2014 10:38:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
08/14/2002
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />August 14, 2002 <br />Page 30 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />right away. He stated he did not understand why Carl Street needed to go through right <br />away. He stated there was not an immediate need to extend Carl Street. He stated the <br />further development of ai rpark lots was essential. <br />Richard Raby, 287 Palomino Lane, stated he was interested in buying one of the <br />proposed Air Park lots and he would give mu ch less consideration to buying if it involved <br />clustered hangars. He stated his preference would be toward havi ng individual hangars <br />that were not attached to other hangars. He st ated he would be interested in a lot that had <br />a size that was the size of the current lots. He stated he would not be interested in a small <br />lot. He stated he would prefer the hangar be located close to th e house and not in any <br />remote location. He stated his had this posi tion because what this Air Park offered was <br />something unique over other airports. <br />Ernest Olsen, 306 Carl Street, stated he purchased his home in 1998 and just recently <br />invested in a new hangar. He stated when he purchased the property, he had spoken with <br />the City, the neighbors and others and he wa s told the cul-de-sac was permanent and it <br />would not go through. He expressed concern a bout the impact of the road on his property <br />values. <br />Robinson Landscaping, 7902 Sunset, stated it was ha rd to develop that area when he had <br />spoken to two developers last year and the City shot them down. How was a road going <br />to go through the sod fields, when the City would not allow it? <br />Chair Schaps stated there were a lot of signifi cant issues that needed to be addressed. He <br />stated they needed to have a neighborhood m eeting prior to the September meeting and if <br />this neighborhood meeting was not held, this woul d be continued again. He stated if the <br />last meeting was in February, another mee ting had to be held. He stated the City <br />supported the Air Park and it was important th is development did not impact the Park. <br />Mr. Johnson stated they had met with the memb ers of the Air Park at least a half a dozen <br />times since the beginning of the year. He stated they had been in communication with <br />the residents and Mr. Uhde had personally s poke with many of them. He stated the big <br />issue was the connection of Carl Street. He asked the Board for an indication as to where <br />the collector road should be located and if th ere should be a collecto r road at this time. <br />He stated they would put the collector road wherever the City wanted it. They would <br />work with whatever proposed worked for ever yone. He stated with respect to the Air <br />Park lots, space became a limiting factor and those lots would go at a premium. He <br />stated they had preserved the airspace and those lots would have conditions placed on <br />them that would prohibit their height and location of the buildings. He stated the <br />collector road was one issue a nd the Air Park was another. He also requested they speak <br />to the park and trail system issues. <br />Chair Schaps requested the Board recei ve copies of all prior plats. <br />Mr. Lyden stated exhibit 5 would protect Ca rl Street. He stated hangars should be <br />individual hangars and the lots should be of the same size in the area. He stated the <br />zoning of R-1 should be R-1X or R-1XL. He stated density was an issue.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.