Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />October 9, 2002 <br />Page 6 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />Staff stated Section 3, subdiv. 4.D.8.e.1-2 also limits the total acce ssory square footage <br />for the subject property to a total of 2,020 sq.ft. and the total number of accessory <br />buildings to one attached garage and two detached accessory buildings. Mr. Brown <br />currently has three accessory buildings: one attached 576 sq.f t. garage (24’ X 24’); one <br />detached 144 sq.ft. accessory building (12’ X 12’); the 864 sq.ft. metal accessory <br />building (36’ X 24’). <br />Staff indicated the total accessory building square footage allowed for Mr. Brown’s <br />property is 2,020 square feet. The three ex isting accessory build ings total 1,584 square <br />feet. <br />Staff stated the subject building is a metal building, sided and roof ed with a corrugated <br />metal, which is prohibited under City ordina nce for a property of this size and zone. <br />Further, the building was constructed without application of a building permit, thus never <br />giving staff the chance for review and subsequent notification to the applicant that such a <br />building was prohibited. <br />Chair Schaps invited appl icant to make comment. <br />Applicant was not present. <br />Chair Schaps asked if they knew when the bu ilding was erected. Ms. Gretz stated she did <br />not know, as a building permit was not pulled; she estimates construction to be in March <br />or April, as that is when Mr. Kluegel noticed the building. <br />Chair Schaps asked if the applicant was not in terested in the suggested structural changes <br />to the building. Ms. Gretz replied that was correct. <br />Ms. Gretz stated they could ta ble this until next month. Ch air Schaps stated he was not <br />comfortable continuing this. <br />Mr. Lyden stated he would suppor t tabling this if the Board decided they needed to have <br />a dialogue with the applicant. <br />Chair Schaps noted if they denied this, it would still go to Counc il and applicant could <br />make comment at that time. <br />Chair Schaps asked if applicant knew he was supposed to be present at this meeting. Ms. <br />Gretz replied she had informed the applicant about the meeting. <br />Mr. Zych stated hearing from the applicant would not change his opinion. He stated the <br />applicant had not followed the City’s Ordinances and it was important to follow the City <br />Ordinances. <br />Ms. Lane made a MOTION to deny Jamie Brown, 442 Main Street, Variance, for the <br />following reasons: The subject building is a metal building, sided and roofed with a <br />corrugated metal, which is prohibited under City ordinance for a property of this size and <br />zone.