Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />November 13, 2002 <br />Page 11 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />Ms. Quimby explained her previous comments by stating she wanted to know if semi- <br />trucks would be going through the oil change facility because her CUP restricted them <br />from working on semi-trucks. Mr. Smyser replied the Quick Lube would not <br />accommodate a semi-truck, only the car wash portion. <br />Ms. Lane made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 7:11 p.m. <br />The motion was supported by Mr. Corson. <br />Motion carried 5-0. <br />Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to table this i ssue until later in tonight’s meeting when <br />they have the further information they need. <br />The motion was supported by Mr. Hyden. <br />Motion carried 5-0. <br />(This issue is continued aft er item 5B – UDOR. Please see additional minutes for <br />final motion on this item.) <br />B.Gordon Johnson, UDOR, 500 Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review <br />Staff stated Mr. Johnson of UDO R company is applying for a s ite plan review in order to <br />construct a second expansion ont o their current facility at 500 Apollo Drive. UDOR first <br />constructed their 6,000 sq.ft. building in 1994. In 1999 a 2,400 sq. ft. addition was <br />constructed. The applicant is now aski ng for approval for a second addition of 3,600 <br />square feet, to be used for cold storage/warehousing and testing. <br />Staff presented its analysis by explaining UDOR is located at 500 Apollo Drive, with the <br />rear of the property abutting the 35W inters tate highway. The proposed addition site is <br />immediately adjacent (south) of the 1999 addition. There is a ponding area to the <br />southwest of the proposed addition site. A ccess to the addition is to be completely <br />internal; there are no docking bays, parking, or sidewalks proposed to access the addition. <br />Staff stated the applicant has submitted no full-view elevation plans. The proposed <br />addition is to be constructed of rock faced block to match the existing building in terms <br />of construction material and height. <br />Staff noted since the addition site is at the rear of the lot, with a ponding area to the south <br />of the site and only approximately 15 feet on the north side of the site, access for <br />construction purposes will be via the propert y to the north, with wh ich the applicant has <br />acquired an access agreement. <br />Staff indicated this site is se rved by both City water and se wer. The existing building is, <br />and the proposed addition will be, sprinkled and meet fire code.