Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />September 14, 2011 <br />Page 6 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />have stated that they consider the city’s signage requirements t oo restrictive to make their <br />business successful. Council has discussed the issue and requested that the planning and <br />zoning board provide comment. <br /> <br />The board was asked whether they considered the city’s exis t ing s ignage requirements to <br />be too restrictive . <br /> <br />Chair Tralle pointed out that when the city revised its requirements not that long ago, <br />very few business owners in the city showed up to make comments. He added that a lot <br />of effort went into revising the ordinance several years ago with little feedback from the <br />public. Therefore he considered that if someone was requesting a change, they should <br />bring their request to a planning and zoning board meeting to state their co ncern s. Staff <br />explained that the City sent out letters to all businesses in the city at the time inviting <br />them to participate in that ordinance revision process. <br /> <br />Staff state d that letters recently were m ailed to business owners in the city explaining <br />temporary signage requirements . Currently, some businesses are in compliance while <br />others are not. Business owners consider signage to be important for competetion with <br />other businesses and the success of t heir sales. Some business owners are wondering <br />why the city is preventing them from advertising their business with signage. <br /> <br />The board was asked to address how many and how often temporary signs should be <br />allowed for a business <br /> <br />Board member comments i ncluded the following: <br /> <br />• Window signage should be enough for business owners to advertise , in addition to the <br />permitted temporary signage allowed . <br /> <br />• The city should be enforcing those businesses that are not in compliance with the <br />rules . <br /> <br />• The number of allow able days for a temporary sign could seem r estrictive and <br />arbitrary. Certain businesses do need signage to be successful and the ordinance <br />could be less restrictive. The city should revisit the length of time allowed for <br />temporary signs. <br /> <br />• The city has st rict requirements to keep architectural standards in the city of high <br />quality, therefore businesses should not cover up high quality architcture with <br />increased signage . <br /> <br />• The city should consider allowing temporary signs for a longer period, but should not <br />consider allowing more signage. <br />