My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/09/2009 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2009
>
09/09/2009 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2014 11:29:48 AM
Creation date
2/13/2014 11:28:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
09/09/2009
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />September 9, 2009 <br />Page 5 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br /> <br />A. Kraus-Anderson, 49/J Update <br /> <br />Mr. Smyser informed the board that the Council Work Session on Tuesday, September 8 <br />included a discussion with developer Kraus Anderson regarding a proposal for a “big <br />box” grocer to be located on the 17-acre site north west of the 49/J Intersection. Mr. <br />Smyser stated that the city has not yet received an application for this project, so there is <br />no formal project to review at this time. Staff ex plained that the discussion at the Council <br />Work Session was at the developer’s request. The d eveloper was seeking reaction from <br />the council, as the next step would be to generate a traffic analysis to determine what <br />would need to happen if this project were to go for ward. The developer held two <br />neighborhood meetings, neither of which was hosted by the city. Kraus Anderson <br />showed the council a potential plan of the site. S enior housing may be proposed, but no <br />user has been determined. City Council reaction se emed to be mixed. Questions were <br />raised regarding a 24-hour business, senior housing , etc. Staff wanted the Planning and <br />Zoning Board to be aware of the situation and reite rated that there is no project to review, <br />therefore no recommendation is needed. <br /> <br />Staff is not aware of any anticipated timing for an application to be submitted. <br /> <br />Mike Witham, 211 Woodridge Lane, commented that he realizes that no formal plan has <br />been submitted. However, speaking for his neighbor s, they wanted to state that the plan <br />the neighbors were shown does not seem to mesh with the master plan for this area. They <br />are aware of traffic issues. The neighbors feel th e master plan was a good plan and they <br />would like to see it carried out. <br /> <br />Mr. Smsyer explained that staff used assumptions of what could develop when creating <br />the master plan for the area. He noted that Anoka County based their review on different <br />analyses. At the time the master plan was created, the county said they would not allow a <br />traffic signal at this location. There is potentia l that the county could change their <br />decision regarding a signal. If this proposal were to go through, the master plan would <br />need to be revised. <br /> <br />Staff has discussed alternate potential locations w ith the developer. <br /> <br />Mike Witham added that the neighborhood has additio nal concerns in excess of traffic. <br />They believe that a single piece of property should not change the entire master plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle commented that the city and boards can p lan for a development, and hope for a <br />direction, however until a developer wants to do so mething, the plan does no good. He <br />said a good example is Legacy at Woods Edge, in whi ch development was hoped for and <br />it has not happened. <br /> <br />B. Comprehensive Plan Update <br /> <br />Mr. Smyser stated that the Draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan was submitted to the <br />Metropolitan Council on August 28. By statute, the Met Council has 120 days to review
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.