My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/09/2000 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2000
>
10/09/2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2014 12:14:09 PM
Creation date
2/14/2014 8:33:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
10/09/2000
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AGENDA ITEMS 7G- 7K <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer <br />COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 9, 2000 <br />TOPIC: Consideration of Resolutions Declaring Costs to be Assessed and <br />Order Preparation of Proposed Assessment <br />VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Four development projects have progressed to the point where assessment rolls <br />can be prepared. Costs for each improvement have been calculated by the City <br />Engineer. Resolutions have been prepared ordering the preparation of the <br />assessment rolls. State Statutes and the Lino Lakes City Charter require a <br />formal resolution ordering preparation of an assessment roll for each <br />improvement project. <br />The developer installed improvement projects to be assessed are as follows: <br />Clearwater Creek 4th Addition <br />Highland Meadows West <br />Pheasant Hills Preserve 11th Addition <br />Trapper's Crossing 3`d Addition <br />There are also several property owners who connected to City utilities this past <br />year and requested the assessments be collected with their taxes. Each <br />resolution will require a separate vote of the City Council. <br />OPTIONS: <br />1. Adopt separate motions for each resolution. <br />2. Return to staff for further review. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends Option No. 1, the adoption of the resolution for each project <br />and for the individual properties that connected. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.