My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/08/2000 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2000
>
11/08/2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2014 12:20:03 PM
Creation date
2/14/2014 10:43:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
11/08/2000
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />addition, it would provide a direct access to the trail that will run through the park to 62nd Street, <br />and its trail to Ware Road. In summary, we believe the trail connection is desirable for the City's <br />trail system. <br />If the City determines that the trail connection is desirable, then we have two suggestions to help <br />with back yard privacy /security. When discussed in 1996, the trail corridor was made 30 feet <br />wide to allow for planting a row of evergreen trees along the north line of the corridor, between <br />the trail and the existing residences. As one alternative, Mr. Carlson is willing to pay the cost <br />installing these trees as part of this project. <br />If security is the most important concern, the existing 4 -foot high barb wire fence between the <br />trail corridor and Birchwood Acres could be improved upon. In addition, 6 -foot evergreen trees <br />will not provide 100% screening for several years after planting. So, as a second alternative, Mr. <br />Carlson is willing to pay for removing the existing barb -wire fence and installing a 6 -foot wood <br />privacy fence along the north line of the trail corridor (between the trail and Lots 1, 2, and 3.) <br />Both alternatives would screen the trail and its users from the back yards of the adjacent homes. <br />And both alternatives would ultimately provide more privacy than not having a trail, because <br />when looking over the trees or fence, the nearest home in West Shadow Ponds would be 30 feet <br />further than if the trail were not there. Aesthetically, trees may be more desirable. For security, <br />however, the fence option may be desired. At any rate, we believe the privacy /security concern <br />can be addressed. <br />In summary, due to wetland rules, the trail corridor can not be moved further south. However, <br />the privacy /security concern can be addressed, and two options have been presented. <br />Sincerely <br />Tedd W. Mattke, P.E. <br />Richard S. Carlson & Associa e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.