My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/13/2000 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2000
>
11/13/2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2014 12:37:03 PM
Creation date
2/14/2014 11:27:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
11/13/2000
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AUGUST 23, 2000 <br />The City Planner advised a request has not been received for a zoning change to that <br />property. The property is located at one of the sites that need clarification. Staff <br />explained the Highway Commercial designation. <br />The Community Development Director advised there is the possibility of mitigation on <br />the northern quadrant. There is a purchase agreement for this property. The closing date <br />is later this fall. There is a question of access to the parcel. A closed meeting has been <br />scheduled on Monday before the regular Council meeting regarding this issue. There has <br />not yet been a definitive plan. A definitive plan is expected in the next six -(6) weeks. <br />The Economic Development Assistant reviewed the two -(2) concept plans for the Village <br />noting the differences. She stated the Village has always been intended to be more of a <br />neighborhood, pedestrian friendly area. <br />The Community Development Director reviewed the land owners <br />Village area. Staff advised the City has the opportunity to purs <br />Livable Communities. The Council needs to indicate their c <br />and design standards. Staff referred to a map pointing o <br />relating to infrastructure. Staff noted the grant would <br />what is needed to complete the infrastructure. <br />volved with the <br />t from the <br />o the concept <br />t would fund <br />ately one -half of <br />Council Member Carlson asked if there will ing o 40 acres. Staff advised that is <br />unknown at this point, however, 40 acres of ousin as presented. The design standards <br />will also apply to housing. <br />TRAIL CONCERN — 6601 LAO <br />Mr. Patronick, 6601 LaCas " orward and stated he moved into the development <br />last year He discovered . , ail 1 be placed adjacent to his home. He expressed <br />the following conce regar he trail: <br />1. Lack of tifi ation <br />2. Undesire s s y neighbors <br />3. No strategic significance <br />4. Safety <br />5. Grading <br />Staff referred to a map showing the line between Clearwater Creek 2nd and 3rd. This <br />particular block is longer than the ordinance allows, which is why the trail was platted. <br />The Public Services Director stated the trail came about in July 1998. Staff indicated <br />they are interest in what Mr. Quigley has to say about the trail. Approval for the project <br />was based on developing a trail on that property due to the long block. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.