My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/11/2000 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2000
>
12/11/2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2014 12:49:50 PM
Creation date
2/18/2014 9:50:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
12/11/2000
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 25, 2000 <br />Centerville Road with the home facing Co. Rd. J. /Ash Street and being located 19.5 feet from the <br />front property line. The property is Zoned Rural and located on a collector roadway requiring a front <br />setback of 40'. The lot is considered to be a pre- existing non - conforming lot of record due to the <br />front setback and the lot size, which is approximately 150 x 227 (10 -acre minimum required). <br />In considering all requests for variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make <br />a finding of fact: <br />1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls. <br />2. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his <br />property not created by the landowner. <br />3. That the hardship is not due to economic consideration • ne and when a reasonable <br />use for that property exists under the terms of the ordnanc <br />4. That granting the variance requested will not <br />privilege that would be denied by this ordi <br />in the same district. <br />pplicant any special <br />r ands, structures, or buildings <br />5. That the proposed actions will be irt ing with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br />Staff has reviewed this request and would c tha here are some hardships involved in this <br />case. The applicant has a mound type s . ' c stem ehind the home with a slight drainage swale in <br />EEC <. <br />front of the system. Locating the gar • Ito the setback requirement may hamper this <br />drainage swale and place the build' too clo o the septic system. The setback for a building from <br />a septic system is 20', the garat,c: tructed at the 40' setback line, would be approximately 6' <br />feet from the base of the syst " Tlere also an existing 8 x 10 storage building, on a slab, that <br />would be located 1' from, he gar •''f constructed according to the applicant's request. The State <br />Uniform Building Code red setback between buildings. <br />Staff has received a letter fr.` the adjoining property owner indicating no objection to the Variance <br />request. <br />The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this request at their September 13, 2000, meeting and <br />recommended approval on a 6 -0 vote to locate the garage 30' from the front property line based on <br />conditions. Staff also recommended approval of the variance request based on conditions. <br />Council Member Carlson moved to approve variance request based on the following conditions: <br />1. Garage shall be located 30' from the front property line. <br />• 2. Property building permits shall be obtained prior to any construction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.