My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/11/2000 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2000
>
12/11/2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2014 12:49:50 PM
Creation date
2/18/2014 9:50:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
12/11/2000
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 25, 2000 <br />Council Member Carlson stated there are two steps being taken in this action: submitting the <br />application and adopting the resolution. Staff advised that if the resolution is not approved the City <br />will have to withdraw the application. <br />Council Member Carlson stated her concern is the application not the resolution. She stated there are <br />statements in the application that the Council has not yet agreed upon. She read the statement <br />regarding the use of funds. She stated it indicates that the City will make a financial commitment that <br />the City has not yet decided on. <br />Staff advised that the City has decided the money will be used for implementation of the project if the <br />City receives the grant. Specifics of how that will work have not yet been decided. The money will <br />be used to acquire the land. <br />Council Member Carlson expressed concern regarding making a financial commitment to put in the <br />infrastructure and buy the property. The Council has to make a decisio e •efore making that <br />commitment. Staff advised no commitment is being made. The M'tropo . A Council will not give <br />money for the project if it can't be implemented. The City will t get the nds if it can't make the <br />project work. <br />Council Member Carlson referred to the summary of financ <br />asked if the information includes the City Hall proje <br />City Hall, YMCA and land costs and infrastruct <br />acquisition. <br />Mayor Bergeson asked if it is fair to say <br />funds. If the resolution is approved <br />project is in a more viable place. <br />many steps that are inter - relate <br />ation in the application. She <br />dvised the information does include the <br />loc funds do include a figure for the land <br />ere are many more steps to go through relating to the <br />Lion is sent, funds will not be received until the <br />cad, there are many more steps to this process. There are <br />ect would come to an end if the resolution is not passed. <br />Council Member O' Don 11 state ` e is very supportive of the project. He stated he agrees that $1.5 <br />million in funding will he . ' He stated the City needs to maintain flexibility on how it might <br />use the $1.5 million relatin o t e project. <br />Staff advised the Metropolitan Council has made it very clear that they are interested in <br />implementation of the project. <br />Council Member Reinert asked what the Council should do with the resolution. He stated the City <br />wants flexibility but the language in the application states the $1.5 million will go to land acquisition. <br />The Council has not agreed to that. Staff indicated they understood that direction was discussed as a <br />possibly cleaner method for getting to the same end. <br />Council Member Reinert stated that there is very specific language used in the application. Options <br />are not a part of the application. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.