Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 25, 2000 <br />Utilities pays none. Staff also considered that a fee that is a percentage of the customer's bill <br />fluctuates a great deal. For example, there are predictions that natural gas prices will skyrocket this <br />winter. A percentage franchise fee would bring in more revenue in a situation like this, but it would <br />be especially burdensome to people and hard to budget for. <br />An alternative that made more sense was a meter fee that would be the same for all customers in a <br />particular classification every month. <br />To establish a monthly fee amount, staff analyzed the number of customers and their average bills. <br />Staff concluded that an average, a 3% monthly fee would be about $1.50 for a residential customer. <br />Staff used the same formula to determine the proposed fees for other customer classifications: a fee <br />that amounts to about 3% of the average bill for those customers. <br />Meter fees in the proposed amounts would raise between $60,00 and $65,000 a year. <br />Staff felt budgeting is easier if customers know their fee will be $1 <br />hand, over the period of the franchise agreement, the value of $ <br />staff is recommending that the 2001 fee be increase by 3% i 00 <br />provided handouts that show the fee amounts each year uii 1 t ran <br />residential customers will be paying $2.08 per month instea <br />eac '" onth. On the other <br />moth erodes. Therefore, <br />eh year after. Staff has <br />cise agreement expires in 2012, <br />It is the City Council's intent that as franchise a, <br />the same period so the City can negotiate simil <br />year and setting different terms for the next e <br />Council's original intent that franchise f ' nclu <br />is exp ` e, the City will make them all cover <br />r all rather than setting terms for one this <br />down the road. It was also the City <br />ed in all renegotiated agreements. <br />The City Council has instructed tha y ewe chise fees collected will be dedicated to road <br />reconstruction. A number of c "`` h. asked whether that is in conflict with The Charter. Staff <br />conferred with the Chair of t er 5mmission and the City Attorney for opinions about that <br />Both indicated there is n. hing e Charter that prohibits use of franchise fees for road <br />reconstruction. <br />A number of callers expressed concern that a franchise fee is just another type of tax. The City <br />Council is aware of that and is making every attempt to ensure that people subject to the proposed fee <br />have an opportunity to provide input. Staff sent letters to every Lino Lakes customer of Reliant <br />Energy Minnegasco in August. Staff allowed a month before holding any public hearings, then <br />scheduled two (2) — the first one tonight and the second on October 9, 2000. <br />Staff has kept track of phone calls and letters of everyone who has contacted the City about the fee <br />and forwarded them to the City Council Members. <br />If the meter fee is approved, there must be two (2) readings of the ordinance. Those are scheduled for <br />October 9 and October 23, 2000. Then the ordinance must be published. It would actually go into <br />effect January 1, 2001. <br />11 <br />