My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/23/2001 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2001
>
04/23/2001 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 3:55:43 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 10:06:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
04/23/2001
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />the future cable - related community needs and interests, and to review the performance of the <br />cable operator under the franchise during the then current franchise term; and <br />WHEREAS, by letter dated September 9, 1995, Meredith Cable Company requested that <br />the City and the Commission commence renewal proceedings in accordance with Section <br />626(a)(1) of the Cable Act, 47 U.S.0 §546(a)(1); and <br />WHEREAS, the Commission and Meredith Cable Company entered into an agreement <br />dated November 15, 1995, whereby the parties agreed to forego the Cable Act's formal renewal <br />procedures, and to toll all Section 626 procedural timelines in order to pursue the informal <br />renewal process pursuant to Section 626(h) of the Cable Act, 47 U.S.C. § 546(h) (the "Standstill <br />Agreement "); and <br />WHEREAS, the Standstill Agreement is binding upon AT &T Broadband; and <br />WHEREAS, the Standstill Agreement permits the Commission to reactivate the formal <br />renewal process set forth in Section 626(a) -(g) of the Cable Act, 47 U.S.C. § 546(a) -(g), at any <br />time, upon notifying AT &T Broadband in writing; and <br />WHEREAS, informal renewal negotiations have been ongoing for a number of years and <br />have not produced a renewal franchise agreement that satisfies the community's future cable - <br />related needs and interests, taking the cost of such needs and interests into consideration; and <br />WHEREAS, the City and the Commission are desirous of reactivating the formal <br />renewal process and commencing the renewal proceedings specified in Section 626(a) of the <br />Cable Act, 47 U.S.C. § 546(a); and <br />WHEREAS, the City desires that such proceedings be conducted through the <br />Commission; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.