My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/09/2001 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2001
>
07/09/2001 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 3:30:09 PM
Creation date
2/21/2014 2:07:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
07/09/2001
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JUNE 19, 2001 <br />Council Member Reinert stated that because the cost of the trees and sprinkler system is <br />very high, there may be a better way to spend that money to eliminate the concerns of the <br />neighbors. The problem will be solved if OSHA allows the beeper ban. He inquired <br />about the liability of OSHA is an employee does get hurt while the beepers are not being <br />used. <br />Mr. Randy Molin, Molin Concrete, stated the company would develop a procedure for the <br />beeper ban and employees would be retrained for the hours between 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 <br />a.m. He indicated he is comfortable with his employees not using the beepers. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated the conditions of approval need to be enforced by the City or an <br />application to change the conditions must be submitted. <br />Mr. Molin indicated he will work with staff on the outstanding issues and changes in the <br />conditions of approval to continue moving forward. <br />WEST SHADOW PONDS, JEFF SMYSER <br />City Planner Smyser distributed a copy of the prelimin for; 'est Shadow Ponds <br />noting it went before the Planning and Zoning Board in 199: °'that time, the Planning <br />and Zoning Board recommended approval. The p� a . sue is the road connection to <br />62nd Street and the traffic issues relating to th • : way. he current proposal is for a <br />road to be constructed with a barricade at 6 d Stre nti162nd Street is reconstructed. <br />There are currently no plans underway t• ec true 62nd Street. A petition was <br />submitted from residents indicated su • for road connection. <br />City Planner Smyser advised t w#'1 b r (4) actions necessary at the regular <br />Council meeting: allocation g 1' es of MUSA reserve, rezone property to R1 -X, <br />preliminary plat approval no bdivision of the remaining property. <br />Mayor Bergeson aske <br />ss s relating to the plat have been resolved. City Planner <br />Smyser indicated all is s r ating to the preliminary plat have been resolved. <br />City Engineer Powell advised reconstruction of 62nd Street will probably not occur until <br />2005. <br />Council Member Dahl stated the plan has changed since it went before the Planning and <br />Zoning Board relating to the number of lots and sewer and water issues. City Planner <br />Smyser stated the plat has not changed since the Planning and Zoning Board approved it. <br />If the property is rezoned sewer and water is no longer an issue. The City Ordinance does <br />allow for a one -acre lot if it includes an existing home and remainder of the property is 10 <br />acres. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.