My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/09/2001 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2001
>
07/09/2001 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 3:30:09 PM
Creation date
2/21/2014 2:07:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
07/09/2001
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />May 9, 2001 <br />Page 18 <br />Mr. Lyden asked what the dollar figure is between the two routes. Mr. Powell estimated <br />a 50% higher cost. <br />Mr. Lyden asked about the potential for utility connections with an east/west route. Mr. <br />Powell estimated one to two. <br />Chair Schaps asked if there was discussion about closure to the north entrance from Birch <br />Street. Mr. Powell stated that was recommended. <br />Chair Schaps invited the applicant to make comment. <br />Mr. Hill, representing Heritage Development, stated he had nothing to add and offered to <br />answer questions. <br />Eugene Gervais, 890 Old Birch Street, stated there are several residents with recently <br />updated septic systems which were costly so he does not support a north/south utility <br />extension. He stated that the street in front of his house is in better shape than Birch <br />Street and he does not want it disturbed. <br />Gary Foster, 882 Old Birch Street, stated he has many concerns. He stated they are <br />changing the directions of access to make it more difficult:„ He suggested the <br />developer should be charged to install the sewer and leave. it up to the residents if they <br />want to connect. Mr. Foster suggested that is the least the developer' should be required <br />to do. He stated 46 houses times two vehicles per house results';in a lot of traffic and will <br />make access a bottleneck and even more impossible than it is currently. Mr. Foster stated <br />they only have one exit, but the new project is to have`` -two exits, which may help a little. <br />He stated that his sewer system is about 15 ye'a old so he does not plan to connect right <br />now. He stated he has lived there for 25 years and understands that development cannot <br />be stopped, but he believes the resident's;; should get something. <br />Mr. Foster stated he has four ° acres On ,a corer lot by the bend in the road and will want to <br />do something in the future so helloes riot want to be dictated to about what he can and <br />cannot do. He asked ,about the potential impact of this project to his property and <br />expressed concern abouthow their ponding and streets will be taken care of to assure they <br />do not impact his $14e <br />Hank Meyers, 904bld Birch Street, stated he has lived there for 30 years and installed <br />Lii}'v, , <br />many of he septic systems being mentioned. He stated he owns ten acres with little <br />wetlands and vantssthe sewer extended. He asked where the sewer will be when he does <br />something "with his property in five years and if the roads will be impacted. <br />Chair Schaps explained that some of those questions cannot be answered since it is not <br />part of this project. <br />Mr. Powell stated if the pavement is disturbed, it will be replaced at a 7 -ton design. <br />Mr. Meyers asked if the sewer will be available to his property when he wants to develop. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.