Laserfiche WebLink
anning & Zoning Board <br />June 13, 2001 <br />Page 27 <br />1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use of used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls. <br />2. That the plight of the landowners was due to physical circumstance unique to his <br />property not created by the landowner. <br />3. That the hardship was not due to economic considerations alone and when a <br />reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. <br />4. That granting the variance requested would not confer on the applicant any <br />special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, <br />or buildings in the same district. <br />5. That the proposed actions would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />ordinance. <br />Staff stated the Planning and Zoning Board may consider that the site was impacted by wetlands <br />and it was located at the intersection of two collector roads thereby limiting design options as a <br />basis for granting the variance. <br />Staff indicated the applicant had submitted grading information that was subject to the review <br />and approval of the City Engineer. <br />Staff stated an existing shed and pole building were located within the new street right -of -way <br />and must be removed. <br />Staff indicated utilities existed in both 12th and Holt ;and extension of utilities down the <br />proposed cul -de -sac was proposed. The water main ride to be looped to 12th Street. The <br />utilities plan was subject to City Engineer review and apal. Holly and 12th were both major <br />collector roads. The purpose of major collectcis;,to channel traffic, and direct access from <br />lots was discouraged. The number of lots front .an Avenue had been reduced from five <br />lots in the concept plan to one lot in tlApgliminary plat. The number of lots fronting on Holly <br />Drive had increased from zero to one. The rest oYie lots were proposed to front on a new cul- <br />de -sac street. Based on modificatioiz ts.?- which reduced the number of accesses staff <br />supported the layout. <br />Staff stated a trail was envisioned along Holly Drive, but had not been designed yet. It had not <br />been decided whether the tratlwould'be on the north or south side of Holly. It would be within <br />the road right -of -way. A trail existed on the east side of 12th Ave. as part of Peregrine Pass. <br />Park dedication for this new development would be cash. <br />Staff stated wetlands exist in the north central and southeast portions of the site. Although the <br />boundaries of wetlands are shown on the preliminary plat, a wetland delineation report had been <br />submitted. Rice Creek Watershed District has granted a TWAFAA (tabled with approval for <br />administrative action) for the development. <br />Staff indicated the site was a former pine tree plantation. A plan for tree preservation has been <br />submitted. The Environmental Board had suggested that some of the trees might be moved. <br />Staff stated because the site was located at the intersection of two collector roads staff would <br />work with the applicants to develop a landscaping plan to provide a buffer between the right -of- <br />way and the homes to be constructed. <br />