My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/21/2004 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2004
>
04/21/2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2014 10:36:38 AM
Creation date
2/28/2014 11:03:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
04/21/2004
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />INS -8 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />DATE: April 19, 2004 <br />TO: City Council <br />FROM: Michael Grochala <br />RE: Pavement Management <br />2004 Street Reconstruction Referendum <br />As discussed at the Joint City Council/Charter Commission meeting on April 8, 2004, <br />staff is working with TKDA to update the Pavement Management Plan that was <br />originally prepared by BRW in 1996. The purpose of the plan is to identify the optimal <br />pavement management program (including reconstruction and maintenance) to maximize <br />the life of City streets at the minimum cost to the community. Staff is anticipating <br />completion of the plan by July of 2004. <br />While the management plan will address, from an engineering and financial standpoint, a <br />preferred method of maintaining city streets, implementation of the plan will most likely <br />require additionally city council/charter commission discussions. <br />At this time staff is requesting direction from the City Council regarding street <br />reconstruction projects. Due to time constraints and project planning purposes we need <br />to determine if a referendum for street reconstruction will be held in November of 2004. <br />TKDA is completing feasibility studies for certain areas of the City that were authorized <br />as part of the original 5 year plan. If we are to proceed with a fall 2004 referendum <br />several questions will need to be addressed. For example: <br />1. Should sanitary sewer and water extensions be included in the feasibility studies? <br />Most of the reconstruction areas lack these services. <br />2. If the answer to No. 1 is yes, is staff to assume that the comprehensive plan <br />amendments, that would be required in most situations, would be facilitated by <br />the City. <br />J:\mgrochala \Staff Reports \City Council \Work Sessions \2004 \4 -21 -04 Pavement Management - referendum.dot <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.