My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/14/2004 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2004
>
06/14/2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2014 10:53:01 AM
Creation date
3/3/2014 9:59:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/14/2004
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Fox Den Acres <br />page 6 <br />PLANNING & ZONING BOARD <br />The P & Z held a public hearing and voted to deny the application at its May 12 meeting. <br />OPTIONS <br />1. Approve the project, including the four elements: <br />a. Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br />b. Rezoning <br />c. Allocation of MUSA Reserve <br />d. Preliminary Plat <br />2. Deny the project by approving Resolution 04 -84. <br />3. Return to staff with direction. <br />(The deadline for city action is July 9. This would allow only the June 28 city council <br />meeting for a final decision unless the applicant extends the review.) <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Option 2 <br />• The City's growth management policy and subdivision ordinance prohibit development <br />outside of defined growth boundaries. The proposed plat extends beyond the stage 1 (pre - <br />2010) growth area, the MUSA, the Low Density Sewered Residential land use area, and the <br />R -1 zone. The proposer requests amendments to the comprehensive plan and zoning map to <br />accommodate the extra 3 -4 acres of development. It also would require the vacation of parts <br />of a ponding and flowage easement. There is no clear justification for these actions other <br />than to increase developable area. <br />• Section 1002 -6 of the subdivision ordinance lists criteria for detemlining if a proposed <br />development is premature. These include consistency with the land use plan, including the <br />staged growth area boundaries. A project that is inconsistent with these criteria is premature. <br />• We do not yet know if water service is adequate. If it isn't, the project is premature. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.