My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/22/2004 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2004
>
09/22/2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2014 10:08:19 AM
Creation date
3/4/2014 12:21:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
09/22/2004
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />WS -2 <br />WORK SESSION MEMORANDUM <br />To: City Council <br />From: Michael Grochala <br />Date: September 8, 2004 <br />Re: Work Session Item #2 <br />Guidelines for Advancing Conservation Design Projects <br />As we discussed at the September 8, 2004 work session the City Council recently adopted <br />the City's Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trail System Plan. An integral <br />component of the plan implementation is to pursue conservation development through a <br />collaborative City/Developer process. The proposed Fox Den Acres subdivision provides <br />an excellent opportunity for the City to begin implementation of the plan. <br />The intent of the conservation subdivision approach is to try and obtain identifiable <br />public values including but not limited to the following: <br />1. Preserve more natural open space <br />2. Restore /enhance ecological systems on the site <br />3. Protect off -site ecological systems <br />4. Ensure long -term natural resource stewardship <br />5. Provide public park and trail opportunities consistent with the System Plan <br />6. Improve stormwater management (flow rates and quality) <br />7. Preserve open space aesthetic <br />8. Maintain natural buffer between established and new developments <br />As a possible incentive to facilitate conservation developments, staff has been evaluating <br />options that would provide development - phasing flexibility while still meeting the <br />Comprehensive Plan's policy of "limit residential growth to an average of 147 units per <br />year... ". One possible alternative is to allow a developer to advance lots under the <br />phasing guidelines set forth in the growth management ordinance in exchange for the <br />conservation development design that provides the identified public values. <br />For Example (using Fox Den): <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.