Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Anoka County Multi- Jurisdictional <br />All Hazards Mitigation Plan <br />Below are tables that summarize the hazards that the Anoka County Hazard Mitigation Planning <br />Committee identified as the potential hazards that could affect the communities in the county. <br />ANOKA COUNTY HAZARD VULNERABILITY SUMMARY <br />Hazard <br />Incidents <br />Years <br />Avg. /yr <br />Fatalities <br />Injuries <br />Assets <br />Cost <br />Flooding <br />37 <br />40 <br />1 <br />1 <br />5 <br />165 <br />204,195,335 <br />PandemicsNectors <br />10 <br />94 <br />.1 <br />89 <br />5929 <br />0 <br />0 <br />Thunderstorms <br />144 <br />34 <br />4.2 <br />4 <br />27 <br />788 <br />30,498,783 <br />Tornadoes <br />25 <br />34 <br />.71 <br />84 <br />672 <br />1,010 <br />123,144,790 <br />Winter Storms <br />81 <br />33 <br />2.4 <br />9 <br />104 <br />32 <br />1,443,379 <br />Wildfires <br />72 <br />24 <br />3 <br />3 <br />6 <br />33 <br />6,515,269 <br />Hazmat <br />453 <br />20 <br />22 <br />3 <br />1 <br />1 <br />274,780 <br />Illegal Meth Labs <br />134 <br />24 <br />5.5 <br />0 <br />1 <br />139 <br />1,134,800 <br />Terrorism <br />176 <br />23 <br />7.5 <br />0 <br />0 <br />1 <br />5,102 <br />Urban Fires <br />175 <br />35 <br />5 <br />36 <br />3 <br />214 <br />15,627,050 <br />Totals <br />1307 <br />229 <br />6748 <br />2,383 <br />382,839,288 <br />After analyzing and evaluating all available data, the Hazard Mitigation Committee developed <br />the historic hazard vulnerability assessments below, using the risk table developed previously <br />by assigning a value (1 through 5). This table is a result of the cumulative impact of total hazard <br />events over a period of years ranging from a low of 20 years of data for hazard events to 94 <br />years of data in the case of pandemics /epidemics. <br />ANOKA COUNTY HAZARD HISTORIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT <br />Hazard Event <br />Fatality and <br />Injury <br />Economic <br />Loss <br />Extent or <br />Impact <br />Probability of <br />Occurrence <br />Repetitive <br />Loss <br />Vulnerability <br />Score <br />Priority <br />Urban Fires <br />5 <br />5 <br />2 <br />5 <br />3 <br />20 <br />1 <br />Thunderstorms <br />2 <br />5 <br />2 <br />5 <br />3 <br />17 <br />2 <br />Flooding <br />2 <br />5 <br />5 <br />3 <br />3 <br />16 <br />3 <br />Tornadoes <br />5 <br />5 <br />1 <br />3 <br />0 <br />14 <br />4 <br />Wildfires <br />2 <br />4 <br />3 <br />3 <br />1 <br />13 <br />5 <br />PandemicsNectors <br />5 <br />3 <br />1 <br />1 <br />2 <br />12 <br />6 <br />Winter Storms <br />4 <br />2 <br />1 <br />3 <br />1 <br />11 <br />7 <br />Hazmat <br />2 <br />1 <br />0 <br />5 <br />2 <br />10 <br />8 <br />Terrorism <br />1 <br />1 <br />2 <br />5 <br />0 <br />8 <br />9 <br />Illegal Meth Labs <br />1 <br />2 <br />1 <br />3 <br />1 <br />7 <br />10 <br />The second assessment table rates the overall impact of a future hazard event Hazardous <br />Materials became the top priority hazard primarily because of the inventory of hazardous <br />materials, the number of facilities in the county and the frequent shipment of hazardous material <br />