My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/08/2007 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2007
>
01/08/2007 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2014 10:25:23 AM
Creation date
3/6/2014 11:21:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
01/08/2007
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
470
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Anoka County Multi- Jurisdictional <br />All Hazards Mitigation Plan <br />4.4.2.2 Future Structure Vulnerability <br />In Anoka County only the hazard flooding has <br />an identified geographic location and is defined <br />by 100 and 500 year floodplain maps. <br />The hazard narratives in the hazard analysis <br />section 4.2, describe the vulnerability of current <br />structures in existing flood hazards in terms of <br />impact, extent and future occurrences of <br />flooding. <br />The table below identifies potential new <br />structures that may be constructed in the flood <br />plain area and the vulnerability of those <br />structures to future flooding events within <br />specific municipalities and Anoka County. <br />Multi- hazard Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(ii)(A): <br />The plan should describe vulnerability in terms <br />of the types and numbers of existing and future <br />buildings, infrastructure, and critical facilities <br />located in the identified hazard area. <br />FMA Requirement §78.5(b): Description of <br />the existing flood hazard and identification of <br />the flood risk, including estimates of the number <br />and type of structures at risk, repetitive loss <br />properties. <br />B. Does the plan describe vulnerability in <br />terms of the types and numbers of future <br />buildings, infrastructure, and critical facilities <br />located in the identified hazard areas? <br />FUTURE FLOODING STRUCTURE ANALYSIS <br />Number of <br />Structure <br />Structure <br />Type <br />Residential <br />Commercial <br />Government <br />Critical etc. <br />Structure <br />and <br />Content <br />Loss <br />Response <br />and <br />Recovery <br />Costs <br />Flood <br />Type <br />Storm Water <br />Out Of Banks <br />Low Lying <br />Maintenance <br />Flood <br />Location <br />Number <br />of events <br />Flood Depth -ft <br />Damage <br />Potential -H,M,L <br />12 <br />Commercial <br />Low Lying <br />Hanson Blvd / <br />Northdale Blvd, <br />Coon Rapids <br />? <br />L <br />1000+ <br />Residential <br />Low Lying <br />The Lakes, Blaine <br />? <br />L <br />6 <br />Commercial <br />Low Lying <br />Vikings Complex, <br />Blaine <br />? <br />L <br />All the above structures will be elevated above the flood elevation and a LOMR will be needed <br />to have the structure area removed from floodplain. Any time development occurs near a <br />floodplain, the cities ensure that the structures are at least two feet above the 100 -year flood <br />elevation. Structures proposed to be built in floodplain areas must go through the LOMR <br />process with FEMA, so that they can be removed from floodplain status. The cities will not allow <br />a structure to be built in a floodplain where it could be flooded. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.