My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/12/2007 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2007
>
02/12/2007 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2014 10:55:39 AM
Creation date
3/7/2014 12:26:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
02/12/2007
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
291
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Summary of Metropolitan Trends in the Housing Market <br />Lino Lakes Experience <br />Lino Lakes is a rural <br />community about 10 miles <br />from the developing edge in <br />Roseville and Maplewood. <br />Lino Lakes begins to <br />experience some traditional <br />suburban style development <br />as the developing edge <br />expands to nearby Arden <br />Hills, Shoreview, and <br />Vadnais Heights. <br />Lino Lakes begins period at <br />the edge of contiguous <br />development as adjacent <br />communities to the south <br />Hare nearly built out or have <br />strong growth management <br />policies (i.e. North Oaks). <br />Lino Lakes experiences <br />development commensurate <br />with being located at the <br />developing edge. Hugo and <br />Forest Lake to the east and <br />north also begin their <br />periods of being at the <br />developing edge. <br />Pace of construction in Lino <br />Lakes drops below that of <br />1990s even though <br />construction throughout the <br />metropolitan area far <br />exceeds that of the 1990s. <br />Important <br />Developments /Milestones <br />16 -County metro area surpasses 2 <br />million people. Interstate freeway <br />system is introduced. <br />Interstate freeway system is mostly <br />developed making once <br />rural /exurban areas more <br />accessible. <br />Mortgage interest rates hit record <br />highs in the early part of the <br />decade. <br />I16- county metro area surpasses 3 <br />(million people. In the core 7 -county <br />'region, 67,500 are consumed for <br />125,000 units, which is 1.85 units <br />per acre. This compares to the <br />1980s when the ratio was 3.3 units <br />per acre or the 1970s when it was <br />3.7 units per acre. <br />Mortgage interest rates hit record <br />lows in the early part of the decade. <br />Where Development Occurred <br />Vast majority of homes built at the <br />developing edge, which is adjacent to <br />the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul.', <br />'Sharp increase in number of units <br />built in developed areas, but also <br />sharp increase in units built in <br />exurban areas to serve the needs of <br />younger buyers who want single - <br />family homes but can't afford to be <br />close to the metro core. <br />More homes built at the developing <br />edge than previous decade. Sharp <br />decline in the rural /exurban areas, <br />likely the result of increased supply <br />containing costs for closer -in unitsand <br />a fuel crises in the early part of the <br />decade. <br />Homebuilding rebounds in the <br />rural /exurban areas of the region. <br />Tremendous growth in rural /exurban <br />areas, but also a strong rebound in <br />the developed core as rising land <br />prices and demogrpahics create a <br />market for "urban" style living. <br />Impact of Age Distribution <br />Strong growth in the number of school - <br />aged children increases demand for <br />affordable single - family homes among <br />young families. Strong growth in <br />college -age persons increases <br />demand for rental housing. <br />Strong growth in number of younger <br />adults results in strong demand for <br />rental housing and very affordable <br />single - family homes. <br />Very strong growth in the age groups <br />skewed toward single - family homes. <br />Significant growth beginning to occur <br />among age groups in the highest <br />income years. <br />Absolute decline in the age groups <br />skewed to renting; age groups skewed <br />toward single - family housing account <br />for all the population growth. <br />Strong growth spread among most <br />age groups; young age groups <br />rebound (Baby Boomlet) and seniors <br />grow substantially as well. Age <br />groups in the peak eaming years (45 <br />to 64 • row as well. <br />Level of Pent -Up <br />Demand <br />Slight pent -up demand <br />by end of decade. <br />Slight oversupply of <br />housing by end of <br />decade. <br />Significant oversupply of <br />housing units by end of <br />decade. <br />Oversupply of 1980s <br />leads to less construction <br />in the 1990s, which <br />results in huge pent -up <br />demand by end of <br />decade, especially since <br />the number of in- <br />migrants to the region far <br />exceeds projections. <br />Pent -up demand at end <br />of 90s leads to rush <br />among builders to build <br />more units, which results <br />in current oversupply. <br />t�0 <br />C.� <br />m , <br />n <br />ro <br />0) <br />0) <br />N <br />m <br />CO <br />0 <br />1) <br />C <br />• N <br />C = <br />CO 2 <br />0 <br />t0 <br />f0 <br />M <br />co <br />0 <br />0) <br />of <br />0i <br />00 <br />00 <br />co <br />ao <br />0) <br />(0 <br />0) <br />ri <br />v- <br />a <br />V <br />CU <br />Q <br />0 <br />O <br />o <br />0) <br />N <br />O <br />1` <br />0) <br />0 <br />O <br />co <br />0) <br />N <br />O <br />0) <br />0) <br />2000- <br />2005 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.