Laserfiche WebLink
TKDA <br />ENGINEERS • ARCH t tt; t s • PLANNERS <br />MEMORANDUM <br />444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 <br />Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 <br />(651) 292 -4400 <br />(651) 292 -0063 fax <br />www.tkda.eom <br />To: Thomas D. Prew, P.E. Reference: Molin Concrete <br />Copies To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Drainage Review <br />City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota <br />From: Connie J. Taillon, P.E. C, -"C Proj. No.: 13810.006 <br />Date: March 30, 2007 Routing: <br />• <br />The following review is based on these submittals: <br />1. Molin Concrete Addition Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan (Office and Overall) and SWPPP, <br />submitted by Piowe Engineering, dated November 21, 2006, and revised March 22, 2007. <br />2. Moline Concrete Addition Drainage Calculations, submitted by Plowe Engineering, dated <br />November 16, 2006, and revised January 11, 2007. <br />The following are significant issues that must be addressed prior to preliminary plat approval: <br />1. Provide information regarding the type of soil and ground water elevation at the location of the <br />infiltration Basin. There should be a minimum of 3 feet of separation between the ground water <br />elevation and the bottom of the infiltration Basin. <br />The following are minor plan, calculations, and drafting corrections that must be addressed prior to final <br />approval: <br />1. The Grading Plan shows that the proposed culvert located north of the proposed office building is <br />discharging towards the existing office building and ascending slope. Direct the culvert away from <br />the existing building. <br />2. Determine the high waxer level at the upstream end of the culvert located north of the proposed <br />office building. Label the high water level of the culvert on the Grading and Utility Plan. <br />3. Show the location and elevation of the emergency overflow for the proposed culvert located north <br />of the proposed office building on the Grading and Utility Plan. The low opening elevations of <br />adjacent buildings are required to be 1 foot above the emergency overflow elevation. <br />4. It appears that runoff from the parking area located south of the proposed office building flows <br />south to Lilac Street, not to proposed Pond 9, as shown on the watershed maps. Ensure that runoff <br />from the roof of the proposed office building is directed to Pond 9, not to the south parking area. <br />5. Include a rock construction entrance detail on the Plan. <br />6. Show the location of the rock construction entrance and silt fence on the Grading and Utility Plan. <br />• <br />An Employee Owned Compan,- 7 4 ig Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity <br />