My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/04/2007 Council Packet (2)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2007
>
06/04/2007 Council Packet (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2014 1:28:45 PM
Creation date
3/11/2014 1:03:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/04/2007
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Budget Appropriations <br />Each year the City adopts an annual budget for the general fund. Each department receives an <br />appropriation based upon detailed budget estimates for individual expenditure accounts. Department <br />heads have the ability to transfer appropriations within a department. This can be helpful and improves <br />flexibility in meeting department needs as they change during the year. However, such a policy can <br />lead to unnecessary or unauthorized expenditures. For example, equipment purchases. <br />We suggest the City review this policy and consider adding controls on the amounts that can be <br />transferred within a department without bringing it to the City Council for approval. These controls could <br />include dollar limits, restrictions on the types of purchases or getting the approval of someone in <br />administration. <br />Developer Escrow Accounts <br />The City maintains an Agency Fund to account for the activity related to developer escrows. It is our <br />understanding that developers deposit an escrow prior to a project beginning and that certain costs may <br />be applied against this escrow. We noted that there are several escrow accounts that carry a "negative" <br />balance (which represents an additional receivable balance from the developer) or have remained idle <br />from the prior year. Efforts were made during 2006 by the City to reconcile negative and idle accounts <br />with the related developers. We recommend that the City continue this process. <br />Conclusion <br />We welcome the opportunity to discuss the points mentioned in this letter or any other accounting and <br />procedural issues in order to coordinate our efforts with you, the mutual objective being the <br />development of more effective accounting procedures for the City. We understand that some of the <br />aforementioned points are in the process of implementation or may already have been implemented; <br />however, these points are noted so that effective follow -up can be accomplished. <br />We sincerely appreciate all the courtesies and cooperation extended to us by you and the staff of the <br />City, and thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you. We look forward to working with you in <br />the future. <br />This report is intended solely for the use of the Finance Committee, City Council, and management of <br />the City of Lino Lakes and is not intended to be, and should not be used by anyone other than these <br />specified parties. <br />LarsonAllen, LLP <br />Austin, Minnesota <br />May 30, 2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.