My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/06/2007 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2007
>
08/06/2007 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2014 1:09:52 PM
Creation date
3/14/2014 11:13:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/06/2007
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Classification and Compensation 4 <br />E. Development of City's Pay <br />Philosophy <br />While salary survey data will assist the City in establishing its position in the <br />competitive market, job evaluation is the mechanism that ensures that internal <br />relationships are equitable and in compliance with the Minnesota Local <br />Government Pay Equity Act. <br />Springsted has developed and copyrighted a job evaluation system known as <br />Systematic Analysis and Factor Evaluation (SAFE') System. The SAFE <br />system is a unique job evaluation method designed to measure job factors which <br />apply specifically to local government. This system has been successfully used <br />for many years and has been reviewed by the United States District Court, in <br />conjunction with an Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) suit, and found <br />acceptable to the Court. <br />The system rates and ranks jobs based on various skill levels and work <br />factors. The result is an equitable and consistent method of evaluating jobs <br />and relating classes to the compensation plan. The system facilitates proper <br />and equitable comparisons between and among classes, and minimizes the <br />appearance of favoritism in evaluating, rating and ranking jobs. <br />Each classification will be evaluated and assigned to an appropriate salary <br />grade based on the classification system and prevailing rates paid by survey <br />participants. <br />The elements considered in determining the relative value of classifications are: <br />• Training and Ability <br />• Level of Work <br />• Physical Demands <br />• Independence of Actions <br />• Supervision Exercised <br />• Education and Experience <br />• Human Relations Skills <br />• Working Conditions/Hazards <br />• Impact on End Results <br />A pay philosophy guides the design of a compensation system and answers key <br />questions regarding pay strategy. It generally takes a comprehensive, long term <br />focus and explains the compensation program's goals and how the program <br />supports the employer's long -range strategic goals. Without a pay philosophy, <br />compensation decisions tend to be viewed from a short-term tactical standpoint <br />apart from the organization's overall goals. <br />Market competitiveness and internal equity are among the most important areas <br />addressed in a pay philosophy. An organization's desired market position <br />involves defining the market and identifying where the organization wants to be <br />positioned within that market. Market position should balance what it takes to <br />attract new employees and to retain skilled employees (in other words, <br />eliminating higher pay as the reason employees leave the organization) with the <br />organization's financial resources. Internal equity expresses an organization's <br />City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota. Proposal to Conduct a Classification and Compensation Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.