My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/24/2007 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2007
>
09/24/2007 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2014 2:13:54 PM
Creation date
3/18/2014 9:20:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
09/24/2007
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
202
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Lino Lakes <br />T ntejo Project No i <br />September 24, 2007 <br />Page 5 <br />walls It is assumed that these walls were not designed to cantilever out of <br />the ground as they stand right now. It is our opinion that these walls are <br />unstable in their condition and they need to be addressed. <br />CORRECTIVE MEASURES <br />4. The following is our opinion on the steps necessary to insure structural stability of <br />the west wall of the house and the ICF walls. Further analysis would need to be <br />completed and construction details provided for all the items listed below: <br />a. Typical foundation wall construction consists of the foundation wall being <br />supported at the base by a concrete slab and at the top by the floor framing. <br />The wall is then designed to span in the vertical direction and reinforced <br />accordingly. It is suggested that the masonry knee wall be extended or <br />replaced with a full height masonry wall up to the main floor framing and <br />reinforced and anchored accordingly. <br />b. The back void will need to be filled and compacted accordingly with special <br />care taken not to overstress the wall. <br />c. There needs to be support established for the north and south walls, at the <br />northwest and southwest corners respectively. This could potentially be <br />completed by providing a connection between the existing foundation walls <br />to the walls of the addition or providing appropriate fill under the foundation <br />walls or a combination of both. <br />d. The floor framing and remaining construction of the addition should be <br />completed to insure stability. <br />5. It may be found that the cost to complete the corrective measures as outlined above <br />may be such that it may not be economically feasible or viable to repair the building. <br />Other options that may be more cost effective could be as follows: <br />a. Complete demolition of the ICF walls and bringing in backfill to the area and <br />returning the structure to its original elevation configuration with a full <br />basement wall at the west wall. The west foundation would still need to be <br />designed and constructed accordingly to insure adequate support is achieved. <br />b. Complete demolition of the ICF walls and bringing in backfill to the area and <br />creating a walkout condition on the west wall of the structure. Again, the <br />west foundation and frame wails would still need to be designed and <br />constructed accordingly to insure adequate support is achieved. <br />c. Complete demolition of the house entirely. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.