Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />✓ Executive Summary <br />1. Executive Summary <br />This report was prepared to review the financial performance of the City of <br />■ Lino Lakes' current Water and Sewer Funds and determine the appropriate rate <br />structure, availability charges, and other revenue needed to adequately fund <br />■ operations through 2017. The process included a historical review of the two <br />utility funds, the evaluation of the appropriate rate structures needed to fund <br />these operations over the planning period, an inclining block rate structure to <br />encourage water conservation, connection fees, a comparison of rates with other <br />similar utilities, and the establishment of charges for other utility services. <br />■ One major consideration in determining the water rates is the possibility the <br />City may construct a water treatment plant and add additional wells. In order to <br />do so, Minnesota State Statutes, Section 103G.291, requires the City to <br />implement demand reduction (conservation) measures prior to seeking approval <br />. to construct new wells or increase the volume of water consumed. Therefore, in <br />determining the water rates and rate structure, Springsted reviewed historical <br />■ water consumption patterns and used this information to recommend a rate <br />structure that would promote water conservation. <br />1 <br />A conservation rate structure provides a financial incentive for users to reduce <br />water consumption based upon the general economic theory that demand for a <br />commodity decreases as its price increases. Water conservation rates generally <br />involve increasing block rates where the marginal cost of water to the user <br />increases in blocks of usually two or more steps as water use increases. <br />Increasing block rates generally have the highest impact on heavy irrigation <br />users. The responsiveness of customers to such a conservation rate structure <br />depends on the existing price structure, the water conservation incentives of the <br />new price structure, and the customer base and their water uses. <br />1 <br />It is important to point out that conservation rate structures by themselves do <br />not constitute an effective water conservation program. Rate structures work <br />best when coupled with a comprehensive program. A water conservation <br />program should include, at a minimum, a public education program and public <br />assistance program to achieve the reduction in per capita water use envisioned <br />by the City. <br />1 <br />All recommendations are based on information provided to us and on the <br />assumptions given for the financial projections. The City will need to monitor <br />. the performance of each fund and make any necessary adjustments based upon <br />its actual performance and on the actual construction costs of the anticipated <br />capital improvements. <br />■ <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />Springsted <br />. City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota. Water and Sewer Study <br />