My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/01/2007 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2007
>
10/01/2007 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2014 2:24:01 PM
Creation date
3/18/2014 10:18:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
10/01/2007
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />a <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />1 <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />1 <br />• <br />• <br />1 <br />• <br />1 <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />1 <br />• <br />• <br />Water Utility <br />19 <br />The corresponding charges /unit were set to generate approximately $1,150,000 <br />in revenues while promoting conservation. The charges /unit also attempts to <br />equalize the impact of the new conservation structure across all users. If <br />consumption patterns remain as they were in 2006, this rate structure is <br />projected to result in more total revenue for the Water Utility Fund. However, <br />because the rates were set to promote conversation and the 2006 consumption <br />patterns reflect use in a year with below - normal rainfall levels (resulting in <br />higher than normal water use), we have assumed consumption to be at 90 <br />percent of 2006 levels. <br />Based on the proposed block rates and charges /unit, the total revenue projected <br />to be collected from each block, at the proposed and current rates is shown <br />below: <br />Volume Used in Proposed Blocks - 2006 LESS 10% <br />Revenue <br />Generated <br />Proposed <br />Block Rates <br />Revenue <br />Generated <br />Current Block <br />Rates <br />Percent of <br />Revenue from <br />Proposed <br />Block <br />Percent of <br />Revenue from <br />Current Block <br />0 - 15,000 <br />10.31% <br />27.76 <br />87,013 <br />90,596 <br />7.53% <br />9.25% <br />15,001 - 30,000 <br />21.45% <br />224.16 <br />218,206 <br />188,403 <br />18.88% <br />19.23% <br />30,001 - 79,000 <br />29.76% <br />102.37 <br />339,633 <br />305,670 <br />29.38% <br />31.19% <br />79,001 - 499,000 <br />24.59% <br />6.35% <br />311,133 <br />252,567 <br />26.92% <br />25.77% <br />> 499,000 <br />13.89% <br />201.49 <br />199,887 <br />142,678 <br />17.29% <br />14.56% <br />Total Volume <br />100.00% <br />School <br />1,155,872 <br />979,913 <br />100.00% <br />100.00% <br />The impact of the proposed rate structure on an average user from each of the <br />City's eight user classes are shown in the chart below: <br />Average Quarterly Use (2005 -2006) <br />Average Use <br />Current <br />Bill* <br />Proposed <br />Bill* <br />Increase <br />$ Increase/ <br />Quarter <br />Residential <br />27.76 <br />49.14 <br />51.66 <br />5.14% <br />2.52 <br />Commercial (a) <br />112.64 <br />224.16 <br />254.73 <br />13.64% <br />30.57 <br />Industrial <br />50.05 <br />94.61 <br />102.37 <br />8.20% <br />7.76 <br />Institutional <br />28.52 <br />50.04 <br />53.22 <br />6.35% <br />3.18 <br />Prison <br />468.74 <br />961.29 <br />1,162.78 <br />20.96% <br />201.49 <br />Church <br />32.68 <br />58.64 <br />62.40 <br />6.42% <br />3.77 <br />School <br />248.33 <br />505.05 <br />600.75 <br />18.95% <br />95.70 <br />Irrigation <br />138.34 <br />277.36 <br />320.26 <br />15.47% <br />42.90 <br />* Does NOT include $10 /ERU fixed fee, which is deposited into the Area and Unit Charge Fund. <br />(a) Excludes one outlier <br />Springsted <br />A chart comparing the average water bill for a residential user in Lino Lakes <br />and other surrounding cities is shown in Appendix A. <br />The City should establish the user rates for the Water Fund for a three -year <br />period and review them on an annual basis. The rates should be reviewed on an <br />annual basis concurrent with the development of the following year's budget. <br />City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota. Water and Sewer Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.