Laserfiche WebLink
What are the future conditions of the cor <br />idor forec <br />Est to be? <br />F/F C/F <br />Existing and Future Level of Service (LOS) Definition <br />Capacity analysis results identify o Level of Service (LOS), which indicates the quality of traffic flow through an intersection. Intersections are given a <br />ranking from LOS A through LOS E The LOS results are based on average delay per vehicle. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation, with vehicles <br />experiencing minimal de s. LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity, or a breakdown of traffic flow. In the Twin Cities <br />Metropolitan area, L05 A through O is generally acceptable by drivers. The standard delay threshold values are identified in the following table: <br />;Service <br />;;� ignation <br />Average Control Delay <br />per Vehicle (seconds) <br />'` <br />Average Control Delay;- <br />per Vehicle (seconds) <br />Description of Tra <br />Conditions <br />A <br />B <br />C <br />D <br />E <br />F <br />Less than or equal to 10 <br />> 10 -20 <br />> 20 -35 <br />> 35 -55 <br />> 55 -80 <br />Over 80 <br />Less than or equal to 10 <br />> 10 -15 <br />> 15 -25 <br />> 25 -35 <br />> 35 -50 <br />Over 50 <br />Stable Flow - Low delays; at <br />traffic signals most vehicles do <br />not stop; acceptable LOS <br />Stable Flow - Low delays; at <br />traffic signals some vehicles most <br />stop; acceptable LOS <br />Stable Flow - Moderate delays; <br />at traffic signals some cycle <br />failures; many vehicles must <br />stop; acceptable LOS <br />Approaching Unstable Flow <br />— Moderate delays; at traffic <br />signals cycle failures become <br />noticeable; many more vehicles <br />must stop; limit of acceptable <br />LOS <br />Unstable Flow - Significant <br />delays; at traffic signals cycle <br />failures are frequent; most <br />vehicles required to stop; <br />unacceptable LOS <br />Forced Flow /Failure - Significant <br />delays; at traffic signals many <br />cycle failures occur; most or all <br />vehicles must stop; unacceptable <br />LOS <br />0 <br />to <br />12,000 <br />CC <br />Y <br />ca <br />J <br />Future o <br />E Lowed <br />Density N <br />-C Residential <br />Future <br />High Density <br />Residential <br />it14,20 <br />F, <br />10,000 <br />Acr <br />:17-v <br />Legend <br />= Signal <br />• = All -way Stop <br />= Side Street Stop <br />x,xxx = 2030 No-Build Daily Traffic Volumes <br />Level of Service - LOS <br />X AM <br />X PM <br />A/B Overall LOS/ <br />Worst Approach LOS <br />Vehicle /Capacity (V /C) Analysis <br />V/C ratios are a common measure of roadway traffic capacity levels. <br />In a V/C analysis, average daily traffic volumes (ADT) are compared <br />to roadway capacity thresholds to identify existing and future traffic <br />problems. The commonly used capacity threshold for a 2 -lane <br />undivided facility such as CSAH 34 is a maximum ADT of 10,000 <br />to 12,000 vehicles per day. Based on forecasted traffic volumes for <br />CSAH 34, the entire corridor will be at or over capacity by 2030. <br />Attachment 2 <br />CSAH 34 Corridor Stud in Lino Lakes <br />