My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/05/2010 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2010
>
04/05/2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2014 11:10:59 AM
Creation date
3/24/2014 11:01:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
04/05/2010
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C. Ultimate Corridor Improvement Plan <br />Four -lane divided roadway (with raised medians) on the western portion of the <br />corridor (CSAH 49 to approximately Black Duck Drive), two -lane divided <br />roadway (with raised medians) on the eastern segment of the corridor (Black <br />Duck Drive to CSAH 54, trials on both sides of CSAH 34, traffic signals at all <br />major intersections (CSAH 49, Ware Road, West Shadow Lake Drive, Black <br />Duck Drive, CSAH 54, and CSAH 21), left and right -turn lanes at other <br />intersections, and backage roads or local street connections. <br />Following the presentation, there was some concern expressed over the ultimate design as <br />proposed. Specifically, concerns were related to the proposed inclusion of a median <br />along the length of the corridor. To better address the council's issues and to formulate a <br />completed study that satisfies the corridor objectives, staff is requesting further council <br />discussion. Specific direction regarding the following plan elements is requested: <br />• Are painted turn lanes at major intersections acceptable? <br />• Are the proposed signal locations acceptable? <br />• Is the proposed ultimate design from Centerville Road to 20th Avenue (two -lane <br />divided/limited access) acceptable? <br />• Are the planned backage roads /local connections acceptable? <br />• Are medians constructed at signal (with turn lane) locations acceptable? <br />• Is a four lane roadway without median and /or painted median acceptable? <br />• Are there any changes to the proposed landscaping /trail elements? <br />Staff will have roadway design layouts available at the meeting to aid in the discussion. <br />Council Direction <br />Staff is requesting council direction regarding the above referenced design elements. <br />Attachments <br />1. Existing and Future Condition Maps <br />2. Landscaping Layouts <br />3. Future Signal and Full Access Locations <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.