Laserfiche WebLink
Civil Rights Division Home Page Page 5 of 8 <br />departure from the general rule, courts have decided, and the <br />Department of Justice and HUD agree, that these procedures must <br />ordinarily be followed. If no procedure is specified, persons with <br />disabilities may, nevertheless, request a reasonable accommodation in <br />some other way, and a local government is obligated to grant it if it meets <br />the criteria discussed above. A local government's failure to respond to a <br />request for reasonable accommodation or an inordinate delay in <br />responding could also violate the Act. <br />Whether a procedure for requesting accommodations is provided or not, <br />if local government officials have previously made statements or <br />otherwise indicated that an application would not receive fair <br />consideration, or if the procedure itself is discriminatory, then individuals <br />with disabilities living in a group home (and /or its operator) might be able <br />to go directly into court to request an order for an accommodation. <br />Local governments are encouraged to provide mechanisms for <br />requesting reasonable accommodations that operate promptly and <br />efficiently, without imposing significant costs or delays. The local <br />government should also make efforts to insure that the availability of such <br />mechanisms is well known within the community. <br />Q. When, if ever, can a local government limit the number of group <br />homes that can locate in a certain area? <br />A concern expressed by some local government officials and <br />neighborhood residents is that certain jurisdictions, governments, or <br />particular neighborhoods within a jurisdiction, may come to have more <br />than their "fair share" of group homes. There are legal ways to address <br />this concern. The Fair Housing Act does not prohibit most governmental <br />programs designed to encourage people of a particular race to move to <br />neighborhoods occupied predominantly by people of another race. A <br />local government that believes a particular area within its boundaries has <br />its "fair share" of group homes, could offer incentives to providers to <br />locate future homes in other neighborhoods. <br />However, some state and local governments have tried to address this <br />concern by enacting laws requiring that group homes be at a certain <br />minimum distance from one another. The Department of Justice and <br />HUD take the position, and most courts that have addressed the issue <br />agree, that density restrictions are generally inconsistent with the Fair <br />Housing Act. We also believe, however, that if a neighborhood came to <br />be composed largely of group homes, that could adversely affect <br />individuals with disabilities and would be inconsistent with the objective of <br />integrating persons with disabilities into the community. Especially in the <br />licensing and regulatory process, it is appropriate to be concerned about <br />the setting for a group home. A consideration of over - concentration could <br />be considered in this context. This objective does not, however, justify <br />requiring separations which have the effect of foreclosing group homes <br />from locating in entire neighborhoods. <br />Q. What kinds of health and safety regulations can be imposed upon <br />group homes? <br />The great majority of group homes for persons with disabilities are <br />subject to state regulations intended to protect the health and safety of <br />their residents. The Department of Justice and HUD believe, as do <br />responsible group home operators, that such licensing schemes are <br />necessary and legitimate. Neighbors who have concerns that a particular <br />group home is being operated inappropriately should be able to bring <br />their concerns to the attention of the responsible licensing agency. We <br />encourage the states <br />http://wvv-w.usdoj.gov/crt/housing/final8_1.php 8/17/2009 <br />