Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION May 3, 2010 <br />DRAFT <br />91 <br />92 4. Pavement Management Update — City Engineer Studenski reviewed his written <br />93 report that provides a review and update of the City's Pavement Management Program <br />94 that was implemented in 2005 to serve as a guide and planning tool for the city's roadway <br />95 system. He reviewed the 2005 findings relative to roadway conditions, past and present <br />96 funding and the estimated current condition of the system. Mr. Studenski remarked that <br />97 the Plan has served the city well and he recommends continuing with it. The council <br />98 questioned the presence of unpaved streets in the city and Mr. Studenski indicated that <br />99 such roadways are difficult to deal with outside of when development occurs on them and <br />100 paving becomes a part of a larger project. <br />101 <br />102 The council discussed the history of the city charter as it relates to road improvements. A <br />103 member indicated that there is benefit in coming to some agreement with the charter <br />104 commission and it may be helpful to look at the amendment proposal approved by the <br />105 charter commission a couple of years ago. Staff was directed to distribute that proposal <br />106 to the council for review and for discussion at the next work session. <br />107 <br />108 5. Five -Year Financial Plan Update — Finance Director Rolek reviewed his report <br />109 on the Plan. The Plan was developed by compiling projected needs (as identified by <br />110 department directors) for the next five years, identifying projected changes in <br />111 expenditures and tax base and using that information to project a tax rate through 2014. <br />112 He reviewed those areas where increases were projected (pavement management, capital <br />113 equipment replacement and energy costs). He reminded the council that the Plan is a <br />114 guideline only — not a commitment but a look into the future based on assumptions. <br />115 When the assumption of including a storm water utility was discussed, a council member <br />116 requested that a schedule be developed and reviewed by the council that clearly indicates <br />117 what such a utility will fund. There was a short discussion about energy saving rebates <br />118 being offered by the federal government and a direction to staff to review the possibility <br />119 of rebates for work on city hall. <br />120 <br />121 After a full review of the document, Mr. Rolek remarked that the bottom line becomes <br />122 the council's decisions on their priorities and that leads into the council's plans for an <br />123 organizational /strategic review. There was recognition amongst the council that the <br />124 charter calls for development of a five -year plan but it must be a meaningful attempt not <br />125 something put together for a deadline. Mr. Rolek also noted an upgrade in the city's bond <br />126 rating. <br />127 <br />128 6. RFP for Organizational Review — The Mayor remarked that the city as a whole <br />129 and council as a group have not benefited from a complete review for some time. He <br />130 believes it is well time to proceed with a review and believes that to get the broadest and <br />131 best perspective it should be administered by a party with both public and private sector <br />132 experience. Two council members submitted information and /or names of possible <br />133 contractors. One council member noted concern about undergoing the exercise of an <br />134 organizational review without a city administrator in place. Since the process will <br />