Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION March 3, 2014 <br />DRAFT <br />90 Ms. Larsen pointed out that there are similar homes built in The Lakes development in <br />91 Blaine and she will send out location information so the council can take a look. <br />92 Modifications requested by the council will be included in the resolution that the council <br />93 sees on Monday. The council concurred. <br />94 <br />95 4. 7309 Lake Drive (Regular Agenda Item) — Community Development Director <br />96 Grochala noted that discussions about this property have been ongoing since early 2013 <br />97 and they involve a code enforcement issue. Through discussions with the property <br />98 owner, staff has worked out a land use agreement that will eventually end the problem use <br />99 and provide some control in the meantime. He reviewed the terms of the proposed <br />100 agreement. Mayor Reinert asked what would happen if, in the meantime, other <br />101 enforcement issues arise? Mr. Grochala replied that staff would then intend to follow <br />102 through with the necessary legal steps relative to that issue. Mayor Reinert suggested <br />103 that this agreement appears to be what the city needs to do to get some control and bring <br />104 this to a manageable situation and the council concurred. <br />105 <br />106 5. FEMA Map Revision — Community Development Director Grochala explained <br />107 the flood plain information before the council. It involves a map showing flood plain <br />108 areas within the city. This information is required in order to qualify for flood insurance. <br />109 There are designated points where the map indicates structures that are not on the flood <br />110 plain. He noted changes to some area lakes (water has risen). The city has a 90 day <br />111 review period and WSB has been asked to calculate impacts to the city. It appears that <br />112 there is little gain of flood plain — it actually stays pretty even. Eventually the city would <br />113 adopt its flood plain ordinance to mirror the new map details. The positive of this new <br />114 map is that it will provide updated information to property owners. <br />115 <br />116 6. Charter Amendment /Street Reconstruction Plan — Community Development <br />117 Director Grochala recalled that at the previous work session, the council reviewed options <br />118 for advancing street reconstruction projects and directed staff to report back on all three <br />119 options. Staff began by working on a street reconstruction plan that will be reviewed. <br />120 Regarding the charter amendment process, staff is presenting two options. Option one is <br />121 basically what went to the voters in 2012 with a few changes that are outlined in the staff <br />122 report (clarifying language regarding benefiting properties, lowering the percentage of <br />123 signatures needed to require an election and lengthening the time period to gather a <br />124 petition). The council discussed the charter amendment process included in statute. <br />125 Mayor Reinert suggested that a meeting with the Charter Commission is very important <br />126 and he hopes that will occur. Mr. Grochala then reviewed charter amendment ordinance <br />127 option two. This ordinance follows existing charter language except for some updating <br />128 and adds the option of street reconstruction financing under state statute. <br />129 <br />130 Mr. Grochala noted that the first reading of an ordinance needs to occur at the next <br />131 council meeting to stay within the schedule for ballot submission. The council discussed <br />132 which ordinance they'd like to submit to the Charter Commission. Ordinance one would <br />133 be more familiar to the commission since it was reviewed in 2012. Ordinance two keeps <br />134 much of the current Charter language for everything except street reconstruction projects. <br />3 <br />