My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/07/2010 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2010
>
06/07/2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2014 1:40:32 PM
Creation date
3/25/2014 10:33:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/07/2010
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Subd. 5. No petition. The City Council may initiate public improvement without a signed <br />petition. The resolution shall generally d. =scribe the public improvement to be studied, and <br />specifically identify the property proposed to be specially assessed_ The City Council may adapt <br />a resolution ordering a feasibility study for these public improvements by the affirmatrve vote of <br />four - fifths all members of the City Council. <br />Section 8.Q5. Feasibility Study. <br />Subdivision 1. Contents. Once public improvements have been initiated under Section 5.04, <br />Sub& 4 or Subd_ 5, the City Council shall direct &twito do a feasibility study. In addition to any <br />requirements under state law, the feasibility study shall contain the following information: (1) a <br />list of the recommended public improvements; (2) changes in the appearance or use of property, <br />such as trees to be removed, easements acquired, and new ar changed storm water facilities; (3) <br />the projected cost for the recommended public improvements; (4) a list of the properties <br />proposed to be specially assessed for the recommended public improvements; and (5) an <br />estimated special assessment per lot for the recommended public improvements. <br />Subd_ 2. Alternatives. If more than a single public improvement (e.6., street lights) is proposed, <br />the feasibility study shall include information on alternatives, such as doing individual <br />improvements or doing riifferent combinations of the improvements (e.a., just streets, streets and <br />street lights., streets and curb and gutter, streets and sanitary sewers, etc.). If one of the public <br />improvements is reconstruction or oth.r work to improve an �,isting street, one alternative must <br />be to do only the street The feasibility study shall contain the information listed in Subd_ 1 <br />above for each of the alternative combinations. <br />Section g.06. Public Hearing. <br />Upon being notified that staff has completed its feasibility study, the City Council shall adopt a <br />resolution scheduling a public hearing on the proposed public improvements. The healing shall <br />be scheduled for a date at least two weeks away. In addition to the requirements in state law, the <br />notice of the public hearing That is sent to the property owner shall be sent by certriled mail, and <br />shall include the information described in Section &115. <br />Se^tion a.07. Indication of Preferences. <br />Subdivision 1. Waiting period After the public hearing, there shall be a period of at least 60 <br />days prior to the net City Council action on the proposed public improvements. Property <br />owners proposed to be specially assessed are given. this 60-day period so that they may indicate <br />their preference regarding the proposed public improvements. Each indication of preference <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.