Laserfiche WebLink
(Re--al 62A, c LA_ <br />(42f /1,, <br />City Council Meeting — June 28, 2010 <br />Open Mike Presenter: Ivy Cavegn, 311 Linda Lane, Lino Lakes <br />Topic: Lino Lakes English Only Proposal <br />There have been press reports of an English Only proposal for the City of Lino Lakes based on <br />budgetary concerns. <br />The Quad Community Press, in its June 22, 2010 edition, stated that documents circulated by <br />city staff state that "30 states and 19 cities have declared English as an official language. <br />However, to clarify, only 16 states have enacted laws stating they are "English Only." "Official <br />language" states do not ban the use of non - English languages in their official government <br />communications. <br />In fact, the United States has never had an official national language -- and throughout its history <br />many languages have been spoken along with English. The Articles of Confederation, ratified in <br />1781, which was the first US Constitution, was written in both English and German. In the early <br />1800s there were several groups pushing to give German equality with English in all published <br />government documents'. Though many citizens feel strongly that the government should <br />establish English as the official language of the United States, other Americans believe that <br />linguistic diversity is a key aspect of our heritage and that English -only laws are motivated by <br />fear and by false stereotypes about non - native speakers <br />However, I'll limit my comments this evening to the economics of "English Only" laws, as this <br />is the stated rationale for the proposal. <br />Economic Ramifications Legally: <br />• Most of the government bodies that have enacted an "English only" law have been or <br />currently are in legal battles based on several factors: <br />o "English only" laws are inconsistent with Section 1 of the 14t'' Amendment which <br />guarantees its legal residents equal protection under the law. Laws that eliminate <br />courtroom interpreters, bi- lingual ballots, access to legal documents or <br />information, or bilingual classroom instruction violate the rights guaranteed in the <br />14th Amendment. Denying equal educational opportunities is a violation of the <br />Civil Rights Act of 1964. <br />o Naturalization for US citizenship does not require English literacy for people over <br />50, or people who have been in the US for over 20 years. "English only" laws <br />deny our older citizens their voting rights because they would not unable to read <br />ballots in their own language or be informed of current community issues being <br />voted upon. <br />o Freedom of speech, freedom of press and political freedom can only occur when <br />people have free access to information. The councilman making this proposal <br />Article by Karl J.R. Arndt, THE GERMAN LANGUAGE PRESS OF THE AMERICAS, vol. 3 (1980) <br />