My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/06/2010 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2010
>
07/06/2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2014 2:59:05 PM
Creation date
3/26/2014 12:49:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
07/06/2010
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />simply eliminate the HUD Senior Covenant. Whether consent is reasonable is always a <br />fact question, but the Authority would have a strong argument on this point. <br />Even more importantly, there is no indication that HUD would have any incentive to <br />remove the HUD Senior Covenant if the HUD Mortgage was not in foreclosure. HUD's <br />sole concern, in requiring the subordination, has been to ensure that the Property is fully <br />unencumbered in the case of foreclosure, where HUD (or the insured lender) must <br />dispose of the Property and protect HUD's investment. The language is nationally <br />standard in FHA - insured deals, and reflects typical concerns of FHA in its role as a <br />lender; it does not originate from other areas of HUD that are more concerned with <br />affordable housing. <br />3. Is there, or can there be, a prohibition on assignment of the HUD <br />Mortgage? <br />No. HUD allows the HUD Mortgage to be assumed by a buyer (along with all the <br />covenants and restrictions that go with it), and would not accept a limitation on that. <br />However, assumption of the HUD Mortgage by a new owner does not impair the <br />Authority's position on the senior restrictions; the HUD Senior Covenant and the City <br />Senior Covenant remain in place as before. In my judgment, the assumability is not a <br />significant issue for the Authority. <br />Conclusion <br />The First Amendment to Contract for Private Redevelopment and Subordination (the <br />Contract), and the Regulatory Agreement for Multifamily Housing Projects (the HUD <br />Regulatory Agreement) are attached. In my view, these documents do not significantly <br />impair the City's goal of retaining the Project in senior use; and in fact, the revised City <br />Senior Covenant extends that limitation for another twenty years after it would have <br />originally expired. <br />The HUD subordination does allow HUD to terminate all senior restrictions in the event <br />of foreclosure, but foreclosure of these types of mortgages is extremely rare. For the <br />reasons described above, there is likewise minimal risk that HUD would, or could, <br />attempt to terminate either the City Senior Covenant or the HUD Senior Covenant even if <br />the Project is not in foreclosure. The City's consent is required for any modification of <br />the HUD Senior Covenant, and it would be reasonable for the City to decline a request to <br />extinguish that covenant. <br />I will be available at the July 6 work session to answer any questions you may have on <br />these matters. <br />370912v3 SJB LN 140 -25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.