My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/09/2010 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2010
>
08/09/2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2014 3:11:52 PM
Creation date
3/27/2014 1:23:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/09/2010
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The flat rate that has been established for single family residential was minimized and was based on the <br />City's baseline costs for stormwater management. The City is considering a partial credit for <br />homeowners with a rain garden or other site specific storm water improvement (approved by the City) <br />that treats runoff from public right -of -way. A 100% credit is not being considered, since the City will still <br />incur some level of the baseline costs for the overall City storm water system, regardless of the level of <br />stormwater management at a specific property. <br />The rate for condos and townhomes is $1.25 per unit and the rate for a single - family home is $2.50 per <br />house. How is this equitable — it seems like the land use for condos and townhomes creates a lot more <br />hard surface within a smaller area? <br />The City has re- evaluated the rate for townhomes and condos. A Utility Factor of 1.49 was used to <br />describe townhomes and condos, which is based on the average hard surface density of a townhome <br />and /or condo development. The rate has been changed to $1.86 per unit for townhomes and /or condos. <br />Now schools will have a new charge. They will ultimately pass that cost back onto the tax payers. So we <br />end up paying for it anyway. <br />The City and tax payers are already funding stormwater management. The SWU is simply a way to <br />distribute the costs in a different way that is more equitable and easier to track in relation to the <br />individuals and entities that use the system. <br />How will we know if this is working and if our lakes and streams are improving in quality? <br />MPCA, University of MN, watershed districts, and other entities have on -going monitoring programs for <br />the lakes and streams in order to understand how the water quality is changing. <br />If the lakes and streams improve with respect to water quality, will the SWU fee be reduced? <br />The City will be expected to continue to maintain the stormwater system in order to maintain water <br />quality. The City will also be expected to continue with the NPDES MS4 obligations, and it is anticipated <br />that the NPDES MS4 program will become more intensive. Since the City will still incur these baseline <br />costs, the fee is not expected to go down if the quality of the lakes and streams improves. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.