My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/13/2010 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2010
>
09/13/2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2014 4:00:30 PM
Creation date
3/28/2014 1:50:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
09/13/2010
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JT CITY COUNCIL /CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING July 8, 2010 <br />DRAFT <br />91 Commissioner Drennen noted there are some old concerns that have come up and that's <br />• 92 to be expected but he for one is interested in keeping the conversation going and <br />93 continuing to have joint meetings. <br />94 <br />95 The group agreed that the time frame for submitting a proposed budget should be within <br />96 the budget discussion cycle — early in August would be appropriate. <br />97 <br />98 B. Unpaid bill from Attorney Marty. <br />99 <br />100 Commissioner Gunderson explained the current status of the commission's account with <br />101 their attorney, Karen Marty, is that most of the outstanding balance is owed in <br />102 conjunction with the commission's response to the city's audit and that when the <br />103 commission was asked to spend no more money (August of 2009) there were no <br />104 additional expenses incurred. The charges on the bill were at one time separated <br />105 according to what was for framing and amending and that portion was paid at the end of <br />106 2009 and the remaining balance is $1,463.05. The commission is looking for a resolution <br />107 on this bill; the attorney did put in the work and she would have the option of coming to <br />108 the city for payment. She believes that the statute allows the city to pay if the council <br />109 deems it necessary. <br />110 <br />111 Mayor Reinert recalled that the council has paid some of the Marty bills and he was <br />112 supportive of paying the bills so that the council and the commission could move to <br />113 working together. The city attorney has since opined, however, that it is illegal for the <br />• <br />114 council to pay this bill. <br />115 <br />116 Commissioner Carlson suggested that it would be helpful to see some legal precedence <br />117 on that opinion. <br />118 <br />119 Mayor Reinert agreed to have the attorney look at the question again and provide some <br />120 legal precedent. <br />121 <br />122 Chair Dahl pointed out that the commission will have difficulty moving ahead until this <br />123 bill is paid and would appreciate a legal review and another opinion. <br />124 <br />125 C. Code of Conduct /Conflict of Interest <br />126 <br />127 Commissioner Gunderson explained that the commission at one time decided to review <br />128 the code of conduct language in the city code especially in light of their desire to have a <br />129 code for the commission. In reviewing the language, they could see it needs some <br />130 revision and have drafted some language; they'd like additionally to get input from the <br />131 council. The draft was compiled using codes from other cities. <br />132 <br />133 Mayor Reinert noted that the passing of laws, policies, and ordinances are generally <br />134 approached to solve a problem or to pave the way to improvement. There is a code of <br />• <br />3 <br />—41— <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.