My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/01/2010 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2010
>
11/01/2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2014 2:24:41 PM
Creation date
3/31/2014 2:57:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
11/01/2010
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br />• <br />• <br />WS — Item 6 <br />WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT <br />Work Session Item 6 <br />Date: November 1, 2010 <br />To: City Council <br />From: Paul Bengtson <br />Re: Home Occupations — Retail Sales <br />Background <br />A resident raised some questions about the Home Occupation ordinance during the open <br />microphone portion of the October 11th City Council meeting, specifically the allowances <br />for direct sales to customers. As directed by the City Council, staff has compiled the <br />following information in regards to sales associated with Home Occupations. <br />The Amendment adopted on February 22, 2010 included the following statement in the <br />General Provisions section of the ordinance, and is therefore applicable to all Home <br />Occupations that operate in the city: <br />No retail of anything produced off -site. <br />Staffs intention behind the use of the word `retail' was to prohibit direct sales to <br />customer on the site only. It was not meant to prohibit mail order businesses or those that <br />include delivery services. In retrospect, it was not staff's intention to prohibit sales to <br />customers already onsite for a service business (barber, massage, etc...), nor was it <br />necessarily meant to prohibit sales events conducted by invitation (Tupperware, <br />Pampered Chef, Avon, etc...). As such, a clarification may be in order and examples of <br />potential ordinance language can be seen in Attachment A. <br />Under the previous ordinance, the following references were made to retail sales <br />activities: <br />Residential Districts — Permitted occupations shall not include any of the <br />following: <br />1) The operation of any wholesale or retail business <br />unless it is conducted entirely by mail or delivery <br />and does not include the sale, shipment, or delivery <br />of merchandise to the premises. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.