My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
State of MN Financing Local Government in the 1980's
LinoLakes
>
Finance
>
Annual Financial Statements
>
State of MN Financing Local Government in the 1980's
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2014 2:55:55 PM
Creation date
4/1/2014 11:37:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Finance Dept
Finance Category
Audit
Finance Number Identifier
Financing Local Government in the 1980's
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Special Report of VRT & CO. <br />Page 8 <br />STATE FINANCIAL RESOURCES APPLIED TO /FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT <br />State and local government in Minnesota truly are financial partners. A substantial <br />portion of the State's General Fund budget is devoted to collecting taxes at the State <br />level and then paying State aids to local government jurisdictions and direct payments <br />• for the benefit of local school districts (i.e., teachers retirement, Minneapolis <br />retirement, police and fire retirement). However, an overview of State budget data <br />• shows clearly that the partnership is not an equal partnership. <br />For the 1981 -83 biennium, local government jurisdictions were "asked" to "do their <br />part" to assist the State in solving its budget situation. This results in a 6% <br />increase in State aids from the previous biennium. Actual State aids were reduced by <br />15% from the January, 1981 proposed budget. This occurred while State government "did <br />their part" with a 17% increase from the previous biennium and approximately the same as <br />the January, 1981 proposed budget. Local government jurisdictions (at the expense of <br />higher property taxes) "did their part" to offset the State budget "balancing" problem <br />while State government "did its part" by limiting its increases to 17 %. <br />WIN <br />However, the State's 1981 -83 Biennium is now history and the State's budget <br />situation is apparently resolved. The 1983 -85 Biennium is now in process and the <br />outlook is better. The State budget has been "balanced" and the State is (wisely) <br />building a reserve balance. State financial resources applied to or for the benefit of <br />local government jurisdictions have been increased by 14% from the previous biennium but <br />still 3% below the January, 1981 proposed budget. Meanwhile, State financial resources <br />applied to /for the benefit of State government have been increased by 29% from the pre - <br />vious biennium and 29% over the January, 1981 proposed budget. In addition to this 29% <br />increase in expendable resources, the State has used $306,123,000 or 4% of its 1981 -83 <br />financial resources and $330,176,000 or 3% of its 1983 -85 budgeted financial resources <br />to build a reserve balance in the State's General Fund. <br />Details of State financial resources applied to /for local government are presented <br />on the next page. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.