Laserfiche WebLink
Special Report of VRT & CO. <br />Page 19 <br />taken) are important indicators of what local government can expect in the future. <br />Actions taken by the State can be easily measured by comparing the State's proposed <br />budget (for the 1981 -83 biennium) with the actual results for the same period. <br />Financial Resources Applied To /For: <br />State Government <br />Local Government <br />Local Taxpayers <br />Reserve Balance (Deficit) <br />Totals <br />1981 -83 Biennium (in $1,000's) <br />1/81 <br />Proposed <br />Budget Actual <br />$3,978,725 <br />4,445,923 <br />316,094 <br />(12,483) <br />$8,728,259 <br />$3,994,858 <br />3,776,641 <br />223,615 <br />306,123 <br />$8,301,237 <br />Variance <br />$ 16,133 <br />(669,282) <br />(92,479) <br />318,606 <br />$(427,022) <br />As illustrated, local government, local taxpayers, plus tax increases (both State <br />and local) "did their part" to help solve the State budget "balancing" situation. What <br />the State did not do was to cut financial resources applied to /for the benefit of State <br />Government. The reduced State financial resources applied to /for the benefit of local <br />government were substantially offset by increased local property taxes. This trend will <br />probably continue unless local government jurisdictions are effective in their lobbying <br />efforts. <br />The above schedule (plus the actions of the State in adopting its budget for the <br />1983 -85 biennium) clearly illsutrates that the State has reversed its previous commit- <br />ment to local government and local taxpayers. State aid will not be available to local <br />government at the levels existing during the 1970's. <br />Another element influenced this situation during 1983. Individual units of local <br />government (Cities) began competing for larger shares of the limited State aids - pri- <br />marily local government aid. This aspect adds a whole new dimension to the situation. <br />Heretofore, such lobbying efforts (for such aids) were limited to a few Cities on a <br />special - purpose basis (i.e., Minneapolis Pensions and Local Police and Fire Pensions). <br />During 1983, such lobbying and competition occurred for general - purpose local government <br />aid effecting many Cities. <br />