My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/06/2010 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2010
>
12/06/2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2014 2:59:22 PM
Creation date
4/1/2014 11:48:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
12/06/2010
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• The property is zoned R -1 Single Family Residential. <br />• Accessory uses allowed in the R -1 zone include "Swimming pools, sport courts, and other <br />recreational facilities which are operated for the enjoyment and convenience of the residents <br />of the principal use and their guests." <br />• Swimming pools and sport courts are common accessory uses customarily found in <br />residential neighborhoods. However, a racing /riding course for off -road vehicles is a very <br />different type of facility, one that has the potential for significant negative impacts on nearby <br />residents — impacts that are not created by permitted facilities such as pools and sport courts. <br />Off -road courses are not customarily found in residential neighborhoods. <br />• The racing /riding track is a "facility" in that there is an established track or route. There also <br />are man-made topographic features that were intentionally created to enhance the experience <br />of riding on the track. This differs from someone who occasionally rides a vehicle across or <br />on the property, such as when moving it into a garage or onto a trailer. <br />• The "other recreational facilities" phrase was not intended to include any and all conceivable <br />types of recreational activities or facilities without regard to their impacts. <br />• For these reasons, the conclusion was that a racing /riding track for off -road vehicles is not <br />allowable as an accessory use on an R -1 property. <br />The property owner disagrees with this conclusion. He believes that if he is not violating sound <br />requirements established for his vehicles, he is not violating any law. Staff's conclusion is based <br />on the uses listed in the Zoning Ordinance, not on statutory noise limits for vehicles. <br />Nonetheless, a resident has the right to disagree with an interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance. <br />The Ordinance provides an appeal process, which requires an application and fee. However, <br />there is another approach to the current situation which is more efficient. <br />As stated in Section 1, Subd. 1.E. of the Zoning Ordinance: <br />In any zoning district, whenever a proposed use is neither specifically allowed nor denied, <br />the City Council shall determine if the proposed use is comparable in potential activities and <br />impacts to a use listed within the zoning district and is acceptable related to land use <br />compatibility, traffic, and /or nuisance issues and established conditions and standards <br />relating to development of the use. <br />In summary, the City Council is the authority to determine if "other recreational facilities" in <br />accessory use 10 in the R -1 zone allows for a dirt track for racing /riding off -road vehicles. That <br />is: is such a track "comparable in potential activities and impacts" to a use that is specifically <br />listed? <br />4 <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.