My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/06/2010 Council Packet (2)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2010
>
12/06/2010 Council Packet (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2014 3:03:45 PM
Creation date
4/1/2014 12:33:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
12/06/2010
Council Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ti <br />Lino Lakes Police <br />Memo <br />To: City Council <br />From:Chief Kent Strege <br />CC: Jeff Karlson <br />Date: December 3, 2010 <br />Re: Dangerous Dog Status <br />The attachment to this memo is an agreement proposed by our city attorney Joe <br />Langel and presented to the Sawh's attorney in an attempt to bring the issue to a <br />close. Earlier this week Mr. Langel forwarded a copy of the agreement to Mr. Sawh's <br />attorney for review with the information that this would need to be returned in time for <br />• inclusion in the Friday City Council packet. <br />This morning I spoke with Mr. Langel and was informed that he had not heard back <br />from the Sawh's or their attorney as of yet. I then contacted Mitchell Sawh and asked <br />if he was aware of the agreement and its current status with his attorney. Mr. Sawh <br />was aware of the agreement being worked on and would check on its status. It is <br />interesting to note that when I asked if he was aware of the status of the agreement <br />he responded by asking if I meant the one about the dog going to Blaine or New <br />York. I told him that New York was the agreement and he replied that his attorney is <br />the one that said something about Blaine. Mr. Sawh stated he would get back to us <br />later today (Friday). <br />Further discussion with the City Attorney affirmed that only out of state placement <br />was given as an option. He will update us if he hears anything from the Sawh's <br />attorney. Please review the attached agreement as the baseline for a discussion on <br />Monday. If wording on a final agreement is reached between the attorneys before <br />Monday we will try to get that to you before the meeting. Should an agreement not <br />be reached on wording then we will be ready to discuss alternative ways to proceed <br />with the issue. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.