Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />To: Mayor and Council <br />From: Jeff Karlson, City Administrator <br />Date: December 13, 2010 <br />Re: Update on Dangerous Dog Agreement <br />Background <br />City Attorney Joe Langel contacted the Sawh's attorney last Monday about the <br />agreement. The following day, the City was served a notice that Mitchell Sawh is <br />appealing the City Council's decision to declare Brody dangerous and the Council's <br />subsequent order to destroy the dog after it bite a third person. <br />On Friday morning, Mr. Langel informed me that he had a couple of conversations with <br />Teri Ayling, counsel for the Sawh's. She asked if there was any chance of exploring <br />some settlement terms with the City. Joe replied that he needs concrete terms to convey <br />to the City Council if they want a settlement. Ms. Ayling also said the Sawh's would like <br />to get their dog back at some point. Joe told her that he did not see this as a possibility <br />given that the Council has ordered the dog to be destroyed. Ayling is going to talk to the <br />Sawh's and see if they want to make a specific proposal to the City. <br />I also spoke with the attorney from the League of Minnesota Cities, Pat Beety, who will <br />be handling the appeal on behalf of the City. Both she and Mr. Langel affirmed that <br />without an agreement from the Sawh's by Monday night, the City Council resumes the <br />right to act on its original order to destroy the dog in accordance with the City ordinance. <br />Barring an agreement, the only thing that would preclude the Council from carrying out <br />its November 22 decision would be a court order obtained by the Sawh's. <br />Joe Langel will provide additional information for the Council at Monday night's <br />meeting. <br />Requested Council Direction <br />Staff is seeking further direction from the Council. <br />